I hugely enjoyed physics when I was a youngster. I had the opportunity both at home and school to create my own projects, which saw me make electronic circuits, crazy flying models like delta-wings and autogiros, and even a gas chromatograph with a home-made chart recorder. Eventually, this experience made me good enough to repair TV sets, and work in an R&D lab in the holidays devising new electronic flow controls.

That enjoyment continued beyond school. I ended up doing a physics degree at the University of Oxford before working on the discovery of the gluon at the DESY lab in Hamburg for my PhD. Since then I have used physics in industry – first with British Oxygen/Linde and later with Air Products & Chemicals – to solve all sorts of different problems, build innovative devices and file patents.

While some students have a similarly positive school experience and subsequent career path, not enough do. Quite simply, physics at school is the key to so many important, useful developments, both within and beyond physics. But we have a physics education problem, or to put it another way – a “future of physics” problem.

There are just not enough school students enjoying and learning physics. On top of that there are not enough teachers enjoying physics and not enough students doing practical physics. The education problem is bad for physics and for many other subjects that draw on physics. Alas, it’s not a new problem but one that has been developing for years.

Problem solving

Many good points about the future of physics learning were made by the Institute of Physics in its 2024 report Fundamentals of 11 to 19 Physics. The report called for more physics lessons to have a practical element and encouraged more 16-year-old students in England, Wales and Northern Ireland to take AS-level physics at 17 so that they carry their GCSE learning at least one step further.

Doing so would furnish students who are aiming to study another science or a technical subject with the necessary skills and give them the option to take physics A-level. Another recommendation is to link physics more closely to T-levels – two-year vocational courses in England for 16–19 year olds that are equivalent to A-levels – so that students following that path get a background in key aspects of physics, for example in engineering, construction, design and health.

But do all these suggestions solve the problem? I don’t think they are enough and we need to go further. The key change to fix the problem, I believe, is to have student groups invent, build and test their own projects. Ideally this should happen before GCSE level so that students have the enthusiasm and background knowledge to carry them happily forward into A-level physics. They will benefit from “pull learning” – pulling in knowledge and active learning that they will remember for life. And they will acquire wider life skills too.

Developing skillsets

During my time in industry, I did outreach work with schools every few weeks and gave talks with demonstrations at the Royal Institution and the Franklin Institute. For many years I also ran a Saturday Science club in Guildford, Surrey, for pupils aged 8–15.

Based on this, I wrote four Saturday Science books about the many playful and original demonstrations and projects that came out of it. Then at the University of Surrey, as a visiting professor, I had small teams of final-year students who devised extraordinary engineering – designing superguns for space launches, 3D printers for full-size buildings and volcanic power plants inter alia. A bonus was that other staff working with the students got more adventurous too.

But that was working with students already committed to a scientific path. So lately I’ve been working with teachers to get students to devise and build their own innovative projects. We’ve had 14–15-year-old state-school students in groups of three or four, brainstorming projects, sketching possible designs, and gathering background information. We help them and get A-level students to help too (who gain teaching experience in the process). Students not only learn physics better but also pick up important life skills like brainstorming, team-working, practical work, analysis and presentations.

We’ve seen lots of ingenuity and some great projects such as an ultrasonic scanner to sense wetness of cloth; a system to teach guitar by lighting up LEDs along the guitar neck; and measuring breathing using light passing through a band of Lycra around the patient below the ribs. We’ve seen the value of failure, both mistakes and genuine technical problems.

Best of all, we’ve also noticed what might be dubbed the “combination bonus” – students having to think about how they combine their knowledge of one area of physics with another.  A project involving a sensor, for example, will often involve electronics as well the physics of the sensor and so student knowledge of both areas is enhanced.

Some teachers may question how you mark such projects. The answer is don’t mark them! Project work and especially group work is difficult to mark fairly and accurately, and the enthusiasm and increased learning by students working on innovative projects will feed through into standard school exam results.

Not trying to grade such projects will mean more students go on to study physics further, potentially to do a physics-related extended project qualification – equivalent to half an A-level where students research a topic to university level – and do it well. Long term, more students will take physics with them into the world of work, from physics to engineering or medicine, from research to design or teaching.

Such projects are often fun for students and teachers. Teachers are often intrigued and amazed by students’ ideas and ingenuity. So, let’s choose to do student-invented project work at school and let’s finally solve the future of physics problem.

The post How to solve the ‘future of physics’ problem appeared first on Physics World.

The control of large, strongly coupled, multi-component quantum systems with complex dynamics is a challenging task.

It is, however, an essential prerequisite for the design of quantum computing platforms and for the benchmarking of quantum simulators.

A key concept here is that of quantum ergodicity. This is because quantum ergodic dynamics can be harnessed to generate highly entangled quantum states.

In classical statistical mechanics, an ergodic system evolving over time will explore all possible microstates states uniformly. Mathematically, this means that a sufficiently large collection of random samples from an ergodic process can represent the average statistical properties of the entire process.

Quantum ergodicity is simply the extension of this concept to the quantum realm.

Closely related to this is the idea of chaos. A chaotic system is one in which is very sensitive to its initial conditions. Small changes can be amplified over time, causing large changes in the future.

The ideas of chaos and ergodicity are intrinsically linked as chaotic dynamics often enable ergodicity.

Until now, it has been very challenging to predict which experimentally preparable initial states will trigger quantum chaos and ergodic dynamics over a reasonable time scale.

In a new paper published in Reports on Progress in Physics, a team of researchers have proposed an ingenious solution to this problem using the Bose–Hubbard Hamiltonian.

They took as an example ultracold atoms in an optical lattice (a typical choice for experiments in this field) to benchmark their method.

The results show that there are certain tangible threshold values which must be crossed in order to ensure the onset of quantum chaos.

These results will be invaluable for experimentalists working across a wide range of quantum sciences.

The post A recipe for quantum chaos appeared first on Physics World.

Precision measurements of theoretical parameters are a core element of the scientific program of experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) as well as other particle colliders. 

These are often performed using statistical techniques such as the method of maximum likelihood. However, given the size of datasets generated, reduction techniques, such as grouping data into bins, are often necessary. 

These can lead to a loss of sensitivity, particularly in non-linear cases like off-shell Higgs boson production and effective field theory measurements.  The non-linearity in these cases comes from quantum interference and traditional methods are unable to optimally distinguish the signal from background.

In this paper, the ATLAS collaboration pioneered the use of a neural network based technique called neural simulation-based inference (NSBI) to combat these issues. 

A neural network is a machine learning model originally inspired by how the human brain works. It’s made up of layers of interconnected units called neurons, which process information and learn patterns from data. Each neuron receives input, performs a simple calculation, and passes the result to other neurons. 

NSBI uses these neural networks to analyse each particle collision event individually, preserving more information and improving accuracy.

The framework developed here can handle many sources of uncertainty and includes tools to measure how confident scientists can be in their results.

The researchers benchmarked their method by using it to calculate the Higgs boson signal strength and compared it to previous methods with impressive results (see here for more details about this).

The greatly improved sensitivity gained from using this method will be invaluable in the search for physics beyond the Standard Model in future experiments at ATLAS and beyond.

The post Neural simulation-based inference techniques at the LHC appeared first on Physics World.

As a teenager in her native Rio Grande do Sul, a state in Southern Brazil, Thaisa Storchi Bergmann enjoyed experimenting in an improvised laboratory her parents built in their attic. They didn’t come from a science background – her father was an accountant, her mother a primary school teacher – but they encouraged her to do what she enjoyed. With a friend from school, Storchi Bergmann spent hours looking at insects with a microscope and running experiments from a chemistry toy kit. “We christened the lab Thasi-Cruz after a combination of our names,” she chuckles.

At the time, Storchi Bergmann could not have imagined that one day this path would lead to cosmic discoveries and international recognition at the frontiers of astrophysics. “I always had the curiosity inside me,” she recalls. “It was something I carried since adolescence.”

That curiosity almost got lost to another discipline. By the time Storchi Bergmann was about to enter university, she was swayed by a cousin living with her family who was passionate about architecture. By 1974 she began studying architecture at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). “But I didn’t really like technical drawing. My favourite part of the course were physics classes,” she says. Within a semester, she switched to physics.

There she met Edemundo da Rocha Vieira, the first astrophysicist UFRGS ever hired – who later went on to structure the university’s astronomy department. He nurtured Storchi Bergmann’s growing fascination with the universe and introduced her to research.

In 1977, newly married after graduation, Storchi Bergmann followed her husband to Rio de Janeiro, where she did a master’s degree and worked with William Kunkel, an American astronomer who was in Rio to help establish Brazil’s National Astrophysics Laboratory. She began working on data from a photometric system to measure star radiation. “But Kunkel said galaxies were a lot more interesting to study, and that stuck in my head,” she says.

Three years after moving to Rio, she returned to Porto Alegre, in Rio Grande do Sul, to start her doctoral research and teach at UFRGS. Vital to her career was her decision to join the group of Miriani Pastoriza, one of the pioneers of extragalactic astrophysics in Latin America. “She came from Argentina, where [in the late 1970s and early 1980s] scientists were being strongly persecuted [by the country’s military dictatorship] at the time,” she recalls. Pastoriza studied galaxies with “peculiar nuclei” – objects later known to harbour supermassive black holes. Under Pastoriza’s guidance, she moved from stars to galaxies, laying the foundation for her career.

Between 1986 and 1987, Storchi Bergmann often travelled to Chile to make observations and gather data for her PhD, using some of the largest telescopes available at the time. Then came a transformative period – a postdoc fellowship in Maryland, US, just as the Hubble Space Telescope was launched in 1990. “Each Thursday, I would drive to Baltimore for informal bag-lunch talks at the Space Telescope Science Institute, absorbing new results on active galactic nuclei (AGN) and supermassive black holes,” Storchi Bergmann recalls.

Discoveries and insights

In 1991, during an observing campaign, she and a collaborator saw something extraordinary in the galaxy NGC 1097: gas moving at immense speeds, captured by the galaxy’s central black hole. The work, published in 1993, became one of the earliest documented cases of what are now called “tidal disruption events”, in which a star or cloud gets too close to a black hole and is torn apart.

Her research also contributed to one of the defining insights of the Hubble era: that every massive galaxy hosts a central black hole. “At first, we didn’t know if they were rare,” she explains. “But gradually it became clear: these objects are fundamental to galaxy evolution.”

Another collaboration brought her into contact with Daniela Calzetti, whose work on the effects of interstellar dust led to the formulation of the widely used “Calzetti law”. These and other contributions placed Storchi Bergmann among the most cited scientists worldwide, recognition of which came in 2015 when she received the L’Oréal-UNESCO Award for Women in Science.

Her scientific achievements, however, unfolded against personal and structural obstacles. As a young mother, she often brought her baby to observatories and conferences so she could breastfeed. This kind of juggling is no stranger to many women in science.

“It was never easy,” Storchi Bergmann reflects. “I was always running, trying to do 20 things at once.” The lack of childcare infrastructure in universities compounded the challenge. She recalls colleagues who succeeded by giving up on family life altogether. “That is not sustainable,” she insists. “Science needs all perspectives – male, female and everything in-between. Otherwise, we lose richness in our vision of the universe.”

When she attended conferences early in her career, she was often the only woman in the room. Today, she says, the situation has greatly improved, even if true equality remains distant.

Now a tenured professor at UFRGS and a member of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences, Storchi Bergmann continues to push at the cosmic frontier. Her current focus is the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), about to begin at the Vera Rubin Observatory in Chile.

Her group is part of the AGN science collaboration, developing methods to analyse the characteristic flickering of accreting black holes. With students, she is experimenting with automated pipelines and artificial intelligence to make sense of and manage the massive amounts of data.

Challenges ahead

Yet this frontier science is not guaranteed. Storchi Bergmann is frustrated by the recent collapse in research scholarships. Historically, her postgraduate programme enjoyed a strong balance of grants from both of Brazil’s federal research funding agencies, CNPq (from the Ministry of Science) and CAPES (from the Ministry of Education). But cuts at CNPq, she says, have left students without support, and CAPES has not filled the gap.

“The result is heartbreaking,” she says. “I have brilliant students ready to start, including one from Piauí (a state in north-eastern Brazil), but without a grant, they simply cannot continue. Others are forced to work elsewhere to support themselves, leaving no time for research.”

She is especially critical of the policy of redistributing scarce funds away from top-rated programmes to newer ones without expanding the overall budget. “You cannot build excellence by dismantling what already exists,” she argues.

For her, the consequences go beyond personal frustration. They risk undermining decades of investment that placed Brazil on the international astrophysics map. Despite these challenges, Storchi Bergmann remains driven and continues to mentor master’s and PhD students, determined to prepare them for the LSST era.

At the heart of her research is a question as grand as any in cosmology: which came first – the galaxy or its central black hole? The answer, she believes, will reshape our understanding of how the universe came to be. And it will carry with it the fingerprint of her work: the persistence of a Brazilian scientist who followed her curiosity from a home-made lab to the centres of galaxies, overcoming obstacles along the way.

The post ‘Science needs all perspectives – male, female and everything in-between’: Brazilian astronomer Thaisa Storchi Bergmann appeared first on Physics World.

Sean Duffy called out SpaceX for being “behind schedule” on a lunar lander and said he’d explore other options.

Lynk Global plans to merge with Omnispace to upgrade its direct-to-device services with globally coordinated S-band spectrum, joining SpaceX and AST SpaceMobile in shoring up satellite frequencies after initially relying on cellular partnerships.

The post Lynk Global and Omnispace to merge in race for direct-to-device satellite spectrum appeared first on SpaceNews.

One in six laboratory-confirmed bacteria in 2023 proved resistant to antibiotic treatment, according to the World Health Organization—all related to a variety of common diseases globally.

When diamond defects emit light, how much of that light can be captured and used for quantum technology applications? According to researchers at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel and Humboldt Universität of Berlin, Germany, the answer is “nearly all of it”. Their technique, which relies on positioning a nanoscale diamond at an optimal location within a chip-integrated nanoantenna, could lead to improvements in quantum communication and quantum sensing.

Nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centres are point defects that occur when one carbon atom in diamond’s lattice structure is replaced by a nitrogen atom next to an empty lattice site (a vacancy). Together, this nitrogen atom and its adjacent vacancy behave like a negatively charged entity with an intrinsic quantum spin.

When excited with laser light, an electron in an NV centre can be promoted into an excited state. As the electron decays back to the ground state, it emits light. The exact absorption-and-emission process is complicated by the fact that both the ground state and the excited state of the NV centre have three sublevels (spin triplet states). However, by exciting an individual NV centre repeatedly and collecting the photons it emits, it is possible to determine the spin state of the centre.

The problem, explains Boaz Lubotzky, who co-led this research effort together with his colleague Ronen Rapaport, is that NV centres radiate over a wide range of angles. Hence, without an efficient collection interface, much of the light they emit is lost.

Standard optics capture around 80% of the light

Lubotzky and colleagues say they have now solved this problem thanks to a hybrid nanostructure made from a PMMA dielectric layer above a silver grating. This grating is arranged in a precise bullseye pattern that accurately guides light in a well-defined direction thanks to constructive interference. Using a nanometre-accurate positioning technique, the researchers placed the nanodiamond containing the NV centres exactly at the optimal location for light collection: right at the centre of the bullseye.

For standard optics with a numerical aperture (NA) of about 0.5, the team found that the system captures around 80% of the light emitted from the NV centres. When NA >0.7, this value exceeds 90%, while for NA > 0.8, Lubotzky says it approaches unity.

“The device provides a chip-based, room-temperature interface that makes NV emission far more directional, so a larger fraction of photons can be captured by standard lenses or coupled into fibres and photonic chips,” he tells Physics World. “Collecting more photons translates into faster measurements, higher sensitivity and lower power, thereby turning NV centres into compact precision sensors and also into brighter, easier-to-use single-photon sources for secure quantum communication.”

The researchers say their next priority is to transition their prototype into a plug-and-play, room-temperature module – one that is fully packaged and directly coupled to fibres or photonic chips – with wafer-level deterministic placement for arrays. “In parallel, we will be leveraging the enhanced collection for NV-based magnetometry, aiming for faster, lower-power measurements with improved readout fidelity,” says Lubotzky. “This is important because it will allow us to avoid repeated averaging and enable fast, reliable operation in quantum sensors and processors.”

They detail their present work in APL Quantum.

The post Chip-integrated nanoantenna efficiently harvests light from diamond defects appeared first on Physics World.

Satellite manufacturer Apex is planning a high-stakes demonstration of interceptor technology in orbit

The post Startup takes on space-based missile defense — with its own cash appeared first on SpaceNews.

By virtually every key metric, efforts to fight climate change are going too slowly, according to findings by a coalition of climate groups. In some cases, things are moving in the wrong direction.

SAN FRANCISCO – Samara Aerospace’s patented satellite-pointing technology will soon be tested in orbit on an Impulse Space Mira orbital transfer vehicle launching on a SpaceX Transporter rideshare. In ground-based testing, Samara has shown that all elements of the company’s Multifunctional Structures for Attitude Control (MSAC) technology can survive launch forces and work well in […]

The post Samara Aerospace pointing technology to be tested in orbit appeared first on SpaceNews.

Prophylactic use of azithromycin saves vulnerable children’s lives, but could trigger antibiotic resistance

Learn more about the crime that took place on October 19, 2025 and about the priceless artifacts that are now missing.

Delivering an oxygenated liquid rectally was so successful in animal studies that researchers are now exploring this method for humans.

Learn more about the lung microbiome and how dust and other matter could be altering the microbes in your airways. 

Learn more about new MRI research that reveals visceral and liver fat can quietly thicken arteries and raise heart disease risk, even for people with a healthy BMI.

Science chats with wildlife epidemiologist Tony Goldberg about what he’s learned from becoming a meal for parasites

Researchers confirmed that sperm accumulate mutations over the years, increasing the risk of transmitting diseases to offspring.

LONDON — The German Aerospace Center (DLR) is looking to purchase satellites capable of jamming other spacecraft and inspecting objects in space, and it wants to do so on tight deadlines.  But experts are skeptical whether Germany could achieve the ambitious goals including launches on a yet unflown domestic launcher after years of underinvestment into […]

The post Analysts question Germany’s request for defensive and inspector satellites appeared first on SpaceNews.

Homes and cities around the world are this week celebrating Diwali or Deepavali – the Indian “festival of lights”. For Indian physicist Rupamanjari Ghosh, who is the former vice chancellor of Shiv Nadar University Delhi-NCR, this festival sheds light on the quantum world. Known for her work on nonlinear optics and entangled photons, Ghosh finds a deep resonance between the symbolism of Diwali and the ongoing revolution in quantum science.

“Diwali comes from Deepavali, meaning a ‘row of lights’. It marks the triumph of light over dark; good over evil; and knowledge over ignorance,” Ghosh explains. “In science too, every discovery is a Diwali –  a victory of knowledge over ignorance.”

With 2025 being marked by the International Year of Quantum Science and Technology, a victory of knowledge over ignorance couldn’t ring truer. “It has taken us a hundred years since the birth of quantum mechanics to arrive at this point, where quantum technologies are poised to transform our lives,” says Ghosh.

Ghosh has another reason to celebrate, having been named as this year’s Institute of Physics (IOP) Homi Bhabha lecturer. The IOP and the Indian Physical Association (IPA) jointly host the Homi Bhabha and Cockcroft Walton bilateral exchange of lecturers. Running since 1998, these international programmes aim to promote dialogue on global challenges through physics and provide physicists with invaluable opportunities for global exposure and professional growth. Ghosh’s online lecture, entitled “Illuminating quantum frontiers: from photons to emerging technologies”, will be aired at 3 p.m. GMT on Wednesday 22 October.

From quantum twins to quantum networks

Ghosh’s career in physics took off in the mid-1980s, when she and American physicist Leonard Mandel – who is often referred to as one of the founding fathers of quantum optics – demonstrated a new quantum source of twin photons through spontaneous parametric down-conversion: a process where a high-energy photon splits into two lower-energy, correlated photons (Phys. Rev. A 34 3962).

“Before that,” she recalls, “no-one was looking for quantum effects in this nonlinear optical process. The correlations between the photons defied classical explanation. It was an elegant early verification of quantum nonlocality.”

Those entangled photon pairs are now the building blocks of quantum communication and computation. “We’re living through another Diwali of light,” she says, “where theoretical understanding and experimental innovation illuminate each other.”

Entangled light

During Diwali, lamps unite households in a shimmering network of connection,  and so too does entanglement of photons. “Quantum entanglement reminds us that connection transcends locality,” Ghosh says. “In the same way, the lights of Diwali connect us across borders and cultures through shared histories.”

Her own research extends that metaphor further. Ghosh’s team has worked on mapping quantum states of light onto collective atomic excitations. These “slow-light” techniques –  using electromagnetically induced transparency or Raman interactions –  allow photons to be stored and retrieved, forming the backbone of long-distance quantum communication (Opt. Lett. 36 1551).

“Symbolically,” she adds, “it’s like passing the flame from one diya (lamp) to another. We’re not just spreading light –  we’re preserving, encoding and transmitting it. Success comes through connection and collaboration.”

The dark side of light

Ghosh is quick to note that in quantum physics, “darkness” is far from empty. “In quantum optics, even the vacuum is rich –  with fluctuations that are essential to our understanding of the universe.”

Her group studies the transition from quantum to classical systems, using techniques such as error correction, shielding and coherence-preserving materials. “Decoherence –  the loss of quantum behaviour through environmental interaction –  is a constant threat. To build reliable quantum technologies, we must engineer around this fragility,” Ghosh explains.

There are also human-engineered shadows: some weaknesses in quantum communication devices aren’t due to the science itself – they come from mistakes or flaws in how humans built them. Hackers can exploit these “side channels” to get around security. “Security,” she warns, “is only as strong as the weakest engineering link.”

Beyond the lab, Ghosh finds poetic meaning in these challenges. “Decoherence isn’t just a technical problem –  it helps us understand the arrows of time, why the universe evolves irreversibly. The dark side has its own lessons.”

Lighting every corner

For Ghosh, Diwali’s illumination is also a call for inclusivity in science. “No corner should remain dark,” she says. “Science thrives on diversity. Diverse teams ask broader questions and imagine richer answers. It’s not just morally right – it’s good for science.”

She argues that equity is not sameness but recognition of uniqueness. “Innovation doesn’t come from conformity. Gender diversity, for example, brings varied cognitive and collaborative styles – essential in a field like quantum science, where intuition is constantly stretched.”

The shadows she worries most about are not in the lab, but in academia itself. “Unconscious biases in mentorship or gatekeeping in opportunity can accumulate to limit visibility. Institutions must name and dismantle these hidden shadows through structural and cultural change.”

Her vision of inclusion extends beyond gender. “We shouldn’t think of work and life as opposing realms to ‘balance’,” she says. “It’s about creating harmony among all dimensions of life – work, family, learning, rejuvenation. That’s where true brilliance comes from.”

As the rows of diyas are lit this Diwali, Ghosh’s reflections remind us that light –  whether classical or quantum –  is both a physical and moral force: it connects, illuminates and endures. “Each advance in quantum science,” she concludes, “is another step in the age-old journey from darkness to light.”

The post Illuminating quantum worlds: a Diwali conversation with Rupamanjari Ghosh appeared first on Physics World.

Learn about the rise of pickleball-related eye injuries, and find out what other injuries are most common when playing pickleball. 

As part of a broader modernization effort, United States defense assistance should focus on freeing Taiwan’s senior military leadership from outdated paradigms by embedding multi-domain operations, joint training and campaign-level wargaming. The Pentagon’s most valuable contribution is doctrinal and architectural: helping Taiwan build a kill web — a distributed sensor-to-shooter network spanning space, air, sea […]

The post Taiwan should build a space-enabled kill web, not big warships appeared first on SpaceNews.

The Orion spacecraft for the Artemis 2 mission has been installed on its Space Launch System rocket as preparations for the circumlunar flight continue despite a government shutdown.

The post Orion installed on SLS as Artemis 2 preparations continue during shutdown appeared first on SpaceNews.

The Chinese particle physicist Chen-Ning Yang died on 18 October at the age of 103. Yang shared half of the 1957 Nobel Prize for Physics with Tsung-Dao Lee for their theoretical work that overturned the notion that parity is conserved in the weak force – one of the four fundamental forces of nature.

Born on 22 September 1922 in Hefei, China, Yang competed a BSc at the National Southwest Associated University in Kunming in 1942. After finishing an MSc in statistical physics at Tsinghua University two years later, in 1945 he moved to the University of Chicago in the US as part of a government-sponsored programme. He received his PhD in physics in 1948 working under the guidance of Edward Teller.

In 1949 Yang moved to the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, where he made pioneering contributions to quantum field theory, wotrking together with Robert Mills. In 1953 they proposed the Yang-Mills theory, which became a cornerstone of the Standard Model of particle physics.

The ‘Wu experiment’

It was also at Princeton where Yang began a fruitful collaboration with Lee, who died last year aged 97. Their work on parity – a property of elementary particles that expresses their behaviour upon reflection in a mirror – led to the duo winning the Nobel prize.

In the early 1950s, physicists had been puzzled by the decays of two subatomic particles, known as tau and theta, which are identical except that the tau decays into three pions with a net parity of -1, while a theta particle decays into two pions with a net parity of +1.

There were two possible explanations: either the tau and theta are different particles or that parity in the weak interaction is not conserved with Yang and Lee proposing various ways to test their ideas (Phys. Rev. 104 254).

This “parity violation” was later proved experimentally by, among others, Chien-Shiung Wu at Columbia University. She carried out an experiment based on the radioactive decay of unstable cobalt-60 nuclei into nickel-60 – what became known as the “Wu experiment”. For their work, Yang, who was 35 at the time, shared the 1957 Nobel Prize for Physics with Lee.

Influential physicist

In 1965 Yang moved to Stony Brook University, becoming the first director of the newly founded Institute for Theoretical Physics, which is now known as the C N Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics. During this time he also contributed to advancing science and education in China, setting up the Committee on Educational Exchange with China – a programme that has sponsored some 100 Chinese scholars to study in the US.

In 1997, Yang returned to Beijing where he became an honorary director of the Centre for Advanced Study at Tsinghua University. He then retired from Stony Brook in 1999, becoming a professor at Tsinghua University. During his time in the US, Yang obtained US citizenship, but renounced it in 2015.

More recently, Yang was involved in debates over whether China should build the Circular Electron Positron Collider (CEPC) – a huge 100 km circumference underground collider that would study the Higgs boson in unprecented detail and be a successor to CERN’s Large Hadron Collider. Yang took a sceptical view calling it “inappropriate” for a developing country that is still struggling with “more acute issues like economic development and environment protection”.

Yang also expressed concern that the science performed on the CEPC is just “guess” work and without guaranteed results. “I am not against the future of high-energy physics, but the timing is really bad for China to build such a super collider,” he noted in 2016. “Even if they see something with the machine, it’s not going to benefit the life of Chinese people any sooner.”

Lasting legacy

As well as the Nobel prize, Yang won many other awards such as the US National Medal of Science in 1986, the Einstein Medal in 1995, which is presented by the Albert Einstein Society in Bern, and the American Physical Society’s Lars Onsager Prize in 1990.

“The world has lost one of the most influential physicists of the modern era,” noted Stony Brook president Andrea Goldsmith in a statement. “His legacy will continue through his transformational impact on the field of physics and through the many colleagues and students influenced by his teaching, scholarship and mentorship.”

The post Influential theoretical physicist and Nobel laureate Chen-Ning Yang dies aged 103 appeared first on Physics World.