↩ Accueil

Vue normale

Jack Black Reveals Why He Turned Down the Role of Syndrome in The Incredibles — and Why It's One of His Biggest Regrets

5 janvier 2026 à 19:08

Jack Black has revealed his regret at turning down the role of Syndrome in The Incredibles, admitting he shouldn’t have been so difficult and just accepted the part.

Speaking on Capital Breakfast's Christmas day show to promote his new movie, Anaconda, Black said he thought Syndrome was a one dimensional character and asked for a rewrite, which writer and director Brad Bird declined.

“I was offered — and I do regret it, saying no — I was offered Syndrome in that fantastic movie, The Incredibles,” Black revealed. “One of my favorites of all time by the way. And I said no, because I was like, ‘Er, Brad Bird, never heard of him. This character that you’re offering me is a villain but he’s kind of one dimensional. I’m interested but I’d like to see a rewrite. Will you add some dimensions to this character?’ And he was like, ‘You’re done. Get out of here.’"

The Jumanji, School of Rock, and Kung Fu Panda star continued: “And I learnt a valuable lesson. Because then the movie came out and it was one of the best movies ever made. I was like, ‘Why was I being so difficult?’”

The role of Syndrome, Mr. Incredible's obsessed fan turned supervillain, went to Jason Lee (My Name Is Earl, Mallrats). Pixar’s The Incredibles came out in 2004 and enjoyed critical and commercial acclaim, making over $630 million at the global box office. The Incredibles did so well it spawned a sequel, with The Incredibles 3 confirmed to be in the works. Anaconda, meanwhile, is now up to $88.4 million at the global box office.

Wesley is Director, News at IGN. Find him on Twitter at @wyp100. You can reach Wesley at wesley_yinpoole@ign.com or confidentially at wyp100@proton.me.

Netflix Announces One Last Adventure: The Making of Stranger Things 5, Which the Duffer Brothers Say Was Inspired by The Lord of the Rings Behind-the-Scenes Documentaries

5 janvier 2026 à 15:00

Netflix has announced One Last Adventure: The Making of Stranger Things 5, a behind-the-scenes documentary on the show’s fifth and final season.

Due out on Netflix on January 12, the film follows the cast, creators, and crew as they bring the final season to life — and say goodbye. One Last Adventure: The Making of Stranger Things 5 is directed by Martina Radwan, who commented:

“I’m endlessly grateful to the Duffer Brothers for trusting me with a front-row seat to this incredible journey. Spending a full year on set with them was a true privilege — and an absolute thrill. Being able to get close and watching them bring this beloved show to life in real time, was pure joy. I only wish I could travel back in time and document Seasons 1 through 4. From the cast to their long-time collaborators, everyone welcomed me with remarkable generosity, openly sharing their personal and collective experiences from a decade of creative filmmaking. The Duffers always push boundaries and inspire everyone to be better, including myself. Their process and the show represents everything I love about filmmaking.”

The trailer, below, teases the film, which touches on the Duffer Brothers' internal discussion around the fate of Eleven, played by Millie Bobby Brown. This is something the pair have discussed in detail in various post-release interviews.

One last time. Watch the never-before-seen behind-the-scenes documentary on the making of Stranger Things 5. Premiering January 12. pic.twitter.com/5FNvTNlvuz

— Netflix (@netflix) January 5, 2026

The Duffer Brothers also issued a comment: “Growing up in Durham, North Carolina, we dreamed of becoming filmmakers — but Hollywood felt impossibly far away. Everything changed when we watched the behind-the-scenes documentaries for The Lord of the Rings — on-the-ground films that showed the real nuts and bolts of how a massive production actually gets made. We saw how stressed Peter Jackson was and thought: yep, that’s the dream. With the decline of physical media, that kind of behind-the-scenes storytelling has largely disappeared. We wanted to bring it back.

"One Last Adventure: The Making of Stranger Things Season 5 — beautifully captured and directed by Martina Radwan — is our attempt to do just that. If you love Stranger Things, or if you’re simply curious how a major Hollywood production comes to life, this one’s for you.”

Peter Jackson’s The Lord of the Rings also influenced the Season 5 finale. Last week, the Duffer Brothers said the lengthy Season 5 finale epilogue and its end credits were inspired by The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King.

“We thought about [The Lord of the Rings] Return of the King a lot, just in terms of the length of the epilogue,” Matt Duffer told Deadline. “I always defend the Return of the King epilogue, but I’m one of those hardcore Lord of the Rings fans, to the point where I’ve watched all extended editions in a row on a single day. If you do that, the epilogue feels absolutely perfect and not long at all. In fact, if it felt shorter, it would feel absolutely distressing.

“I think, Stranger Things, if you watch Season 5 all the way through, it’s going to feel great. You just want to spend extra time with these characters. Anyway, that was sort of the reference for the epilogue. Then we love the credits at the end of Return of the King. So that was the initial idea, and they were these very simple illustrations.”

Stranger Things may have come to an end, but we’ve got plenty more on the show, including the Duffer Brothers explaining why the demogorgons didn’t help Vecna out in the final battle, and first details on the live-action spinoff.

Image credit: Netflix.

Wesley is Director, News at IGN. Find him on Twitter at @wyp100. You can reach Wesley at wesley_yinpoole@ign.com or confidentially at wyp100@proton.me.

Now All 11 Seasons of The X-Files Are Free to Stream, Newcomers Are Falling in Love With the Show for the First Time, and Veterans Are Re-Ranking Their Favorite Episodes

5 janvier 2026 à 13:49

The X-Files is back in the conversation after all 11 seasons were made available to stream for free — sparking an influx of newcomers and veterans rewatching and reappraising their favorite episodes and moments from the series.

Mulder and Scully’s spooky sci-fi adventures were made available on free streamer Pluto TV last week, with 218 episodes including the 2016 revival on demand and on a 24/7 linear channel dedicated to the series. This has fueled renewed interest in one of the most popular TV shows of the 90s from fans, who are — as they did 30 years ago — venturing online to discuss its various plot twists.

As a veteran X-Files fan myself, I’ve enjoyed seeing newcomers express their delight in watching the show for the first time, getting to grips with its overarching alien abductions and government cover-ups storyline, as well as its classic ‘Monster of the Week’ episodes.

“We just finished episode one of season one and...wow! We loved it,” said one fan. “It even looks and sounds better than modern TV shows, I suppose because it was shot on location and not on sets. But it just feels better acted, as well as looking better. If going back in time to enjoy TV is going to be even HALF as good as this experience, then that is what we will be doing from now on! I want to believe.”

Veteran fans are expressing their jealousy at those experiencing the X-Files for the first time, knowing what is to come — and issuing warnings for the occasional spoof episode in which David Duchovny’s Mulder and Gillian Anderson’s Scully let their hair down. “Mulder and Scully are quite the comic duo when they want to be,” one fan told a newcomer.

i love when im watching the x-files and they causally drop some of the most cinematic shots in history pic.twitter.com/Y3UgO10zuq

— nika⸆⸉ 🦔🍁 (@guiltyasScout) January 4, 2026

Of course, fans are re-ranking their favorite episodes as well as monsters (no spoilers here!). They’re also wondering whether the series would have been better off ending before its divisive ninth season. And there is of course plenty of healthy… debate about the rights and wrongs of poor old Krycek.

It’s worth remembering that X-Files was one of the first shows with an online “fandom,” with its reaction culture perhaps foreshadowing the future of the internet. X-Files promoted theorycrafting, in-jokes, and memes. There were plenty of hoaxes, the odd backlash, and… shipping. The fandom became as big a part of the experience as watching the show itself, laying the groundwork for 30 years of discourse.

And perhaps the X-Files will get to do it all over again. Ryan Coogler, the director of Creed, Black Panther, and Sinners, is currently working on an X-Files revival for television, and Gillian Anderson has expressed her interest in reprising her role.

“We intend on having both Monsters of the Week and the overarching conspiracy,” Coogler recently said of X-Files. “I’m grappling with that. But that's what I'm doing now. Panther comes after that. I’m blessed to be working on things this cool.”

Wesley is Director, News at IGN. Find him on Twitter at @wyp100. You can reach Wesley at wesley_yinpoole@ign.com or confidentially at wyp100@proton.me.

'After the Movie, It Kind of Stuck With Me for a Bit' — Black Panther Star Michael B. Jordan Went to Therapy to Help 'Decompress' From Playing Killmonger

5 janvier 2026 à 12:45

Michael B. Jordan has revealed he went to therapy after playing Killmonger in Marvel movie Black Panther.

Jordan’s Erik Killmonger is considered one of the best MCU villains, with his performance opposite the late Chadwick Boseman’s T'Challa / Black Panther winning plaudits from critics and fans alike. Killmonger is a Wakandan prince raised in Oakland, California, after his father, N'Jobu, was killed by King T'Chaka. A brilliant black-ops operative and former U.S. Navy SEAL, Killmonger seeks revenge on Wakanda for abandoning his father and aims to use its vibranium to arm oppressed people worldwide, eventually challenging T'Challa for the throne.

But it was a role that clearly took its toll on Jordan, who told CBS Sunday Morning that he needed therapy to help shake off the character after the movie came out in 2018.

"Each character kind of lives with you. They don’t go anywhere. They’re there," Jordan said. "Some piece of that character… it’s a blurred line between yourself and the character, for me, anyway. With Killmonger, Erik, it was a complex, layered antagonist. I don’t look at him as a villain. I look at him as an antagonist, because you understood him a bit. He was the other side of a conversation. Him and T'Challa were a lot alike, they both cared about their people, deeply, and would do anything to protect them. They just had two different approaches and strategies and mentalities around it all, shaped by their childhood trauma.

"And Erik didn’t really know a lot of love. Erik didn’t experience that. He had a lot of betrayal. He had a lot of failed systems around him that shaped him, and his anger and his frustration, and looking at history and how it seemed to always repeat itself, and how was he going to break that cycle?

“So for a while in preparation for that role, I didn’t really speak to my family that much. I was kind of isolated a bit. I went to my hole and tried to live like he would have lived for a bit, whatever that process was. After the movie, it kind of stuck with me for a bit. Went to therapy, talked about it, found a way to kind of just decompress. I think at that point, I was still learning that I needed to decompress from a character.

“Again, there’s no blueprint to this. There wasn’t a lot of people that… acting is a solo journey a lot of times. There’s a lot of auditioning by yourself, practicing by yourself. There’s a lot of preparation and the experience, the journey. So learning as I went, I [realized] that, ‘Oh man, I still got a little something on me that I need to get off.’ You know, talking is really important.”

Jordan went on to say that seeking therapy is “necessary for people, especially men.” “I think it’s good for them to go and talk and get that off,” he added. “That’s something I’m not ashamed of at all and very proud of. It definitely helped me throughout the years and to this day, of trying to be a good communicator and well-rounded person inside and out.”

Jordan went on to reprise his role as Donnie Creed in Creed III, which he also directed, and play twin brothers Elijah "Smoke" Moore and Elias "Stack" Moore in 2025’s hit horror movie, Sinners.

Wesley is Director, News at IGN. Find him on Twitter at @wyp100. You can reach Wesley at wesley_yinpoole@ign.com or confidentially at wyp100@proton.me.

Sin City and Iron Man 2 Star Mickey Rourke Launches Fundraiser to Pay $60,000 in Rent After Eviction Notice

5 janvier 2026 à 11:48

Mickey Rourke, star of Sin City and Iron Man 2, has launched a fundraiser to pay $60,000 in rent after a threat of eviction.

The Hollywood Reporter revealed that 73-year-old Rourke is using GoFundMe to raise money to pay $59,100 in owed rent after receiving an eviction notice from his Los Angeles rental home.

Rourke enjoyed superstardom in the '80s before leaving acting to pursue professional boxing. He made a comeback to mainstream Hollywood with the lead role in 2005 neo-noir action thriller Sin City, then starred in 2008's critically acclaimed The Wrestler, for which he was nominated for an Academy Award and won a Golden Globe, and 2010 MCU sequel Iron Man 2 as main villain Whiplash.

Here’s the plea:

Mickey Rourke entered American cinema like a force of nature — raw, fearless, and utterly original. In the late 1970s and 1980s, he wasn’t just a movie star; he was a symbol of something rare: danger paired with vulnerability, toughness paired with heart. From Diner to Rumble Fish to 9½ Weeks, Mickey gave audiences performances that felt lived-in, not performed, and left a permanent mark on American film culture. Mickey’s life never followed a safe or protected path. At the height of his success, he stepped away from Hollywood in search of truth and authenticity, choosing risk over comfort. Boxing — real and punishing — left lasting physical and emotional scars, and the industry that once celebrated him moved on quickly. What followed were years of struggle not defined by spectacle, but by survival: health challenges, financial strain, and the quiet toll of being left behind.
Today, Mickey is facing a very real and urgent situation: the threat of eviction from his home. This fundraiser is being created with Mickey’s full permission to help cover immediate housing-related expenses and prevent that from happening. Mickey Rourke is an icon — but his trajectory, as painful as it is, is also a deeply human one. It is the story of someone who gave everything to his work, took real risks, and paid real costs. Fame does not protect against hardship, and talent does not guarantee stability. What remains is a person who deserves dignity, housing, and the chance to regain his footing. The goal is simple: to give Mickey stability and peace of mind during an extremely stressful time — so he can stay in his home and have the space to get back on his feet. Any donation, no matter the size, will make a real difference. And if you’re not able to contribute, sharing this page is a huge help and deeply appreciated. Thank you so much for your kindness, compassion, and support.

At the time of this article’s publication, $51,680 was raised of the $100,000 target, from 1,300 donations.

Rourke reportedly approved the GoFundMe page, which was launched by Liya-Joelle Jones, a friend and member of Rourke’s management team. Jones told The Hollywood Reporter: “Mickey is going through a very difficult time right now, and it’s been incredibly touching to see how many people care about him and want to help.”

According to The Los Angeles Times, Rourke signed the lease on his three-bedroom, two-bathroom home, in March 2025 for $5,200 per month. It was later raised to $7,000 per month. According to the publication, Rourke received a three-day notice to pay rent or vacate the premises mid-December, but failed to comply.

The GoFundMe page includes a number of messages of support. “Shed any unnecessary feelings of embarrassment and instead BASK IN THIS LOVE!” said one donor. “I’m sitting here truly enjoying watching these donations grow so quickly. All these people wanting to connect with you in even the smallest way — that’s the real gift here, right? And F 'Mister Nobody' — his screen name says it all. At least you got 5 bucks out of him.” “Go Micky thanks for Sin City!!” said another. “Hang in there, Bullet! We got you ;-)” another fan said.

Rourke was ejected from Celebrity Big Brother UK in 2025 due to inappropriate language and behavior that he later admitted, including remarks about the sexuality of his fellow contestant JoJo Siwa. “I’m ashamed of myself,” he said at the time. His manager later announced he would take legal action against the reality show, claiming its producers “were fully aware of both his public persona and how it aligned with his Hollywood rebel image,” but had refused to pay his full agreed fee after his exit.

Photo by Paul Archuleta/Getty Images.

Wesley is Director, News at IGN. Find him on Twitter at @wyp100. You can reach Wesley at wesley_yinpoole@ign.com or confidentially at wyp100@proton.me.

The Only Stranger Things Cast Member Who Knows What Really Happened to Eleven Is Millie Bobby Brown — and the Duffer Brothers Have Sworn Her to Secrecy

5 janvier 2026 à 10:45

The biggest talking point coming out of the Stranger Things finale relates to the fate of its central character, Eleven, played by Millie Bobby Brown. While Season 5, Episode 8, dubbed The Rightside Up, leaves her fate ambiguous, creators the Duffer Brothers know the truth — and the only cast member also in the know is Millie Bobby Brown herself. But don’t expect either the Duffer Brothers or Millie Bobby Brown to spill the beans — they’ve sworn her to secrecy.

Stranger Things ends with a definitive wave goodbye to all the central characters except Eleven, who appears to sacrifice herself to ensure she cannot be used to create super weapons, another Vecna / Henry, or another bridge between our world and The Abyss.

18 months after that traumatic event, we see the central characters meet up for graduation and say their goodbyes. It’s at this point that Mike Wheeler, played by Finn Wolfhard, has a thought: what if Kali Prasad, also known as Eight (Linnea Berthelsen), used her dying breath to create the illusion of Eleven’s death, leaving her free to escape unseen?

Mike teases this revelation to the Dungeons & Dragons group as their final campaign comes to an end, suggesting Eleven cooked up a plan with Kali to fake her own death, then traveled to a far away small village — bordered by three waterfalls — to live out her days in peace. But this ending is unconfirmed. Mike and the others choose to believe it, and it’s left up to the audience to decide what they choose to believe as Stranger Things finally comes to an end.

Matt and Ross Duffer have explained the Stranger Things ending already, but in an interview with Josh Horowitz, they confirmed they wrote the story knowing the truth of Eleven's fate, and they’ve told only one cast member: Millie Bobby Brown herself.

“You're writing from a point of view of understanding what the truth is, right? And the reality is?” explained Matt Duffer. “So yeah, Ross and I know. And we were just talking to Millie about it. But I think it takes away the power of the ending if you tell people what you were thinking as you were writing it.”

During the interview, Matt revealed the Duffers had just texted Millie Bobby Brown about this exact subject — and she promised not to spill the beans. “She's not going to tell you either!” Matt Duffer said. “Don’t waste your time! Millie swore herself to secrecy.”

It then occurred to the creators that Millie Bobby Brown is very close to Noah Schnapp, who plays Will Byers in Stranger Things, so she might end up telling him. That prompted a text during the interview from Matt to Millie, warning her against doing so. “I’m not even joking,” Matt Duffer said, “I’m literally going to text her right now!”

In the same interview, the Duffers revealed that they did explore the possibility of Eleven having a “full happy ending” where she ends up married to Mike, living a happy life with the government off their backs and the lab experiments ended for good, “and we just couldn't figure out a way for that to work.”

In a Netflix Q&A published as the finale aired, Ross Duffer went into more detail on the thinking behind the Stranger Things ending: “there was never a version of the story where Eleven was hanging out with the gang at the end. For us and our writers, we didn’t want to take her powers away. She represents magic in a lot of ways and the magic of childhood. For our characters to move on and for the story of Hawkins and the Upside Down to come to a close, Eleven had to go away. We thought it would be beautiful if our characters continued to believe in that happier ending even if we didn’t give them a clear answer to whether that’s true or not. The fact that they’re believing in it, we just thought it was such a better way to end the story and a better way to represent the closure of this journey and their journey from children to adults.”

“And the reality is, if Eleven is out there, the most that they could hope for is a belief that it’s true because they can’t be in contact with her,” Matt concluded. “Everything falls apart if that were the case. So if that’s the narrative, this is really the best way to keep her alive. And it’s about Mike and everyone finding a way to move past what’s happened.”

We've got plenty more on Stranger Things, including the Duffer Brothers explaining why the demogorgons didn’t help Vecna out in the final battle, and first details on the live-action spinoff.

Wesley is Director, News at IGN. Find him on Twitter at @wyp100. You can reach Wesley at wesley_yinpoole@ign.com or confidentially at wyp100@proton.me.

Avatar: Fire and Ash Becomes Third Film in the Franchise to Surpass $1 Billion Globally — but Will It Match Avatar 1 or 2 at the Box Office?

4 janvier 2026 à 18:27

Avatar: Fire and Ash has become the third film in the franchise to surpass $1 billion at the global box office, but questions remain on whether it will end up matching Avatar 1 or 2 by the end of its theatrical run — or convince Disney to green light Avatar 4 and 5.

On weekend three, James Cameron’s Fire and Ash made another $40 million domestically, marking a 37% drop week on week. It’s now up to $306 million domestically. Fire and Ash is proving a bigger hit internationally — particularly in China — with $777.1 million so far from theaters. That makes for a grand total of $1.083 billion. Disney said Fire and Ash pushes the Avatar franchise total past $6.35 billion globally.

The special effects-heavy Avatar films cost a huge amount of money to produce, but they have historically made billions of dollars at the box office. Avatar 1 remains the highest-grossing movie of all time (not adjusted for inflation), and has earned a staggering $2.9 billion across several theatrical runs. Avatar: The Way of Water has earned $2.3 billion, meanwhile, cementing it as the third-highest grossing film of all time — just ahead of Cameron's own Titanic.

Will Fire and Ash end up matching the box office hauls of its predecessors? Fire and Ash is slower to $1 billion than both Avatar 1 and 2, but not by much. The Way of Water, released in 2022, hit $1 billion 14 days after launch, and Avatar, released in 2009, reached $1 billion after 17 days. Fire and Ash managed $1 billion 18 days after release.

The Avatar films typically show impressive staying power at the global box office, particularly internationally, so the coming weeks will be crucial. Adding a helping hand, Disney is drip-feeding Avengers: Doomsday teaser trailers ahead of Fire and Ash in theaters in a bid to encourage repeat viewings (the X-Men trailer is set to be replaced by a fourth next week).

Perhaps the pertinent question is, will Avatar 3 end up making enough money theatrically to convince Disney to greenlight Avatar 4 and 5? Disney has given both sequels release dates already: Avatar 4 currently has a December 21, 2029 release date, with Avatar 5 due out December 19, 2031. Cameron, now 71, would be close to 80 years old by the time it all wraps up.

But will he get the chance? In the run up to Fire and Ash’s release, Cameron admitted he was feeling nervous about the film’s box office performance and expressed concern about the “forces” working against theatrical releases in 2025.

Speaking on The Town with Matthew Belloni podcast, Cameron said there was potential for “sequelitis.” He added: "people tend to dismiss sequels unless it’s the third Lord of the Rings film and you want to see what happens to everybody, which in my mind this is — this is the culmination of a story arc, but that may not be how the public sees it.” And there’s the “one-two punch” of streaming and Covid, which means fewer people are going to the movies — 75% of the number in 2019, Cameron suggested.

When pressed on how much Avatar: Fire and Ash cost to make, Cameron wouldn’t be drawn into divulging a figure, only suggesting it was a lot of money, and so the movie will have to make a lot of money to turn a profit.

“It is one metric f**k ton of money, which means we have to make two metric f**k tons of money to make a profit,” he said. “I have no doubt in my mind that this movie will make money. The question is, does it make enough money to justify doing it again?”

And on that point, Cameron admitted he was “absolutely” ready to walk away from Avatar if Fire and Ash flops. “I’ve been in Avatar land for 20 years,” he said. “Actually 30 years because I wrote it in ‘95, but I wasn’t working continuously on it for those first 10 years. Yeah, absolutely, sure. If this is where it ends, cool.” But what about open story threads? “There’s one open thread. I’ll write a book!” Cameron responded.

Disney has yet to comment on the prospects of Avatar 4 and 5, but announcing Fire and Ash’s $1 billion milestone tonight, the company called the figure “another monumental achievement for James Cameron's groundbreaking franchise and underscoring its unparalleled connection with audiences worldwide.”

“Avatar: Fire and Ash has demonstrated the franchise's signature theatrical staying power, building its global total through sustained performance driven by premium-format demand, and extended international play,” Disney continued, “hallmarks that have defined the Avatar phenomenon since 2009.”

Photo by Stéphane Mouchmouche / Hans Lucas / AFP via Getty Images.

Wesley is Director, News at IGN. Find him on Twitter at @wyp100. You can reach Wesley at wesley_yinpoole@ign.com or confidentially at wyp100@proton.me.

Where Were the Demogorgons in the Stranger Things Final Battle? The Duffer Brothers Have an Explanation for That

4 janvier 2026 à 16:41

One of the lingering questions Stranger Things fans having coming out of the Season 5 finale relates to the series’ famous monsters, the demogorgons. Or, perhaps put more accurately, the lack of them.

In the final battle (Season 5 Episode 8, The Rightside Up), which Stranger Things has built up to for nine years and five seasons, our heroes battle against Vecna and the Mind Flayer, but not the demogorgons, the demodogs, or the bats we’ve seen previously. Where were they? Surely Vecna and the Mind Flayer would have had a better time of things if they’d had their pals help them out against Eleven, Steve, and the others. Were they sleeping on the job? A revolt, perhaps?

In an interview with TheWrap, Stranger Things co-creators Matt and Ross Duffer offered a detailed explanation, which involves a few factors. One, Vecna was caught unawares. He did not expect a sneak attack in The Abyss, so was not prepared for what was coming. Related, he had the Mind Flayer helping him out, so why would he need any more help? (This was, obviously, a bad decision.)

Meanwhile, all those demo monsters aren’t just hanging around Vecna at any given moment, the Duffer brothers said. There are not a lot of them in The Abyss.

And then we get to what I think is probably the most important reason, which has to do with what Stranger Things had done earlier in the season. The Duffers were mindful of what they called “demo fatigue,” having had a dramatic fight against the demogorgons at the end of Season 5, Volume 1, when Will’s powers awaken and he kills a handful of the things with his mind.

“Mainly it’s just that Vecna was not expecting this sneak attack on his home turf,” Matt Duffer explained. “Never in a million years could he even imagine that. They’re there somewhere. We obviously discussed having a demo battle on top of the Mind Flayer battle, but it felt more right to us that why does he need the demos when the Mind Flayer is this giant thing and can attack them? He doesn’t need his little ant army to attack, he’s going to take care of this himself.

“It’s a giant, desolate planet. If you recall, you see Henry wandering the planet back in Season 4 and at some point in his journey, he does see a demo far in the distance, but it’s not like they’re hanging out in little huts. There’s not like a giant civilization of demos up there.”

Matt Duffer continued: “one of the other things we talked about was just demo fatigue. I felt like we did everything we wanted to do with them in Sorcerer, and wanting to keep the focus on Vecna and the Mind Flayer, who’s been absent this season.”

So there you have it. Vecna’s confidence was his undoing, it seems — and a touch of “demo fatigue.”

According to Matt Duffer, there was an idea to have the heroes encounter a giant field of demo eggs in The Abyss in a scene reminiscent of Aliens, “but you can’t get all your ideas in there.” Apparently the demos were going to come out of the eggs and everything.

Some fans have suggested the fight against the Mind Flayer would have been made all the more epic by the addition of demogorgons. Having Will control them and turn them against the Mind Flayer and Vecna is a popular fan suggestion, too. But there’s no going back now. With the Upside Down destroyed, the demogorgons are stranded in The Abyss — hopefully forever.

We've got plenty more on Stranger Things, including the Duffer brothers explaining what they were going for with the Season 5 finale and Eleven's ending, and first details on the live-action spinoff.

Image credit: Netflix.

Wesley is Director, News at IGN. Find him on Twitter at @wyp100. You can reach Wesley at wesley_yinpoole@ign.com or confidentially at wyp100@proton.me.

Arc Raiders Dev Confirms It Recently Added Aggression-Based Matchmaking, but 'It's Not a Full Science'

4 janvier 2026 à 15:47

Arc Raiders developer Embark Studios has confirmed one of the community’s biggest questions since the game came out: it does indeed feature ‘aggression-based matchmaking.’

This means that if you’re big into PvP, you’ll be matched up with players who are like-minded. Similarly, if you prefer PvE, you’ll be matchmade with players who tend to avoid conflict with other players.

Arc Raiders’ player versus environment versus player gameplay has resulted in a number of viral clips showing how friendly encounters can quickly devolve into a fight to the last. Yes, you can play solo or in parties up to three, working as a team to progress through the game. However, other players are a constant threat. This has sparked a vociferous debate within the community about the etiquette that has formed in-game, with a retired pro gamer going viral for relentlessly killing casual Arc Raiders players.

It turns out that Arc Raiders will lean on your playstyle when it comes to matchmaking. This ‘aggression-based matchmaking,’ however, is not an exact science, Patrick Söderlund, CEO of Embark Studios told Games Beat in a recent interview / video playthrough of the game.

“Obviously first it's skill-based of course,” Söderlund said of Arc Raiders matchmaking. “Then you have solos, duos, and trios. And then we also, since a week ago or so, we introduced a system where we also matchmake based on how prone you are to PvP or PvE. So if your preference is to do PvE and you have less conflict with players… you'll get more matched up [with similar players]. Obviously it's not a full science.”

Söderlund said the term ‘aggression-based matchmaking’ is “exactly” the system Arc Raiders currently uses. That puts to bed high-level questions about how Arc Raiders matchmaking works for the community, which had wondered about it in recent months. “I can finally stop arguing on Reddit, thank you for the vindication,” said one player.

However, it’s worth noting that Söderlund confirmed Arc Raiders prioritizes "skill" when it comes to matchmaking, then groupings. Aggression-based matchmaking is a factor, but we don’t know how much influence it has on your lobbies compared to other factors. And even Söderlund admitted it doesn’t always works as you’d think.

And how, exactly, does Arc Raiders determine if you’re “prone” to PvE or PvP? If you’re a kill on sight player, sure, you’re probably prone to PvP. But what if you only shoot back at those who shoot at you first? Does that make your lobbies more aggressive? If so, is that fair?

So, one big question answered, but many more remain. As for Embark Studios, it always hoped Arc Raiders would have a tension between both playstyles. Arc Raiders is a multiplayer extraction adventure in which players scavenge the remnants of a devastated world, but the main threats are Arc’s machines and, as Embark Studios puts it, “the unpredictable choices of fellow survivors.”

Wesley is Director, News at IGN. Find him on Twitter at @wyp100. You can reach Wesley at wesley_yinpoole@ign.com or confidentially at wyp100@proton.me.

'Do People Still Have the Appetite?' — Titanic Star Leonardo DiCaprio Wonders Whether Cinemagoing Will Become Niche

4 janvier 2026 à 14:54

The future of cinemagoing is top of mind as 2026 kicks off, with Netflix, which is buying Warner Bros. for $72 billion, reportedly interested in a 17-day window for theatrical releases before they hit the streaming platform. Meanwhile, box office revenue is struggling, with even Marvel movies — previously guaranteed hits — having trouble getting fans into theaters. The big question right now is, are we witnessing the beginning of the end of going to the cinema?

Hollywood legend Leonardo DiCaprio has expressed concern about the future of cinemagoing, wondering whether it will become a niche pursuit. In an interview with The Sunday Times, the Titanic, Inception, and The Wolf of Wall Street star wondered whether “people still have the appetite” for theaters, and, if not, whether they might “become silos — like jazz bars.”

“It’s changing at a lightning speed,” DiCaprio said. “We’re looking at a huge transition. First, documentaries disappeared from cinemas. Now, dramas only get finite time and people wait to see it on streamers. I don’t know.”

Then: "Do people still have the appetite? Or will cinemas become silos — like jazz bars?" While expressing this concern, DiCaprio said he hoped “real visionaries” continue to make unique movies that are seen in theaters, "But that remains to be seen.”

DiCaprio, who starred in 2025’s critically acclaimed One Battle After Another, isn’t alone in worrying for the future of cinemagoing. But some have gone even further. Last year, Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos said the theatrical experience is “an outmoded idea for most people,” and claimed Netflix is “saving Hollywood.”

One Battle After Another ended its theatrical run making $205 million globally. According to Variety, Warner Bros. needed it to make roughly $300 million to break even on the film, which means it’s looking at a $100 million loss, give or take.

And while James Cameron’s Avatar: Fire and Ash has crossed the $1 billion mark at the global box office, it’s not going to get anywhere near the money the previous two Avatar movies made in theaters. In the run up to Fire and Ash’s release, Cameron admitted he was feeling nervous about the film’s box office performance and expressed concern about the “forces” working against theatrical releases in 2025.

Speaking on The Town with Matthew Belloni podcast, Cameron said there was potential for “sequelitis.” He added: "people tend to dismiss sequels unless it’s the third Lord of the Rings film and you want to see what happens to everybody, which in my mind this is — this is the culmination of a story arc, but that may not be how the public sees it.” And there’s the “one-two punch” of streaming and Covid, which means fewer people are going to the movies — 75% of the number in 2019, Cameron suggested. In the same interview, Cameron said Netflix buying Warner Bros. would be a “disaster.”

One report has claimed Netflix is particularly keen to obtain Warner Bros.' vast content library as the streamer ramps up its potential to offer AI-generation tools and content in the future.

Photo by Stuart C. Wilson/Getty Images for Warner Bros.

Wesley is Director, News at IGN. Find him on Twitter at @wyp100. You can reach Wesley at wesley_yinpoole@ign.com or confidentially at wyp100@proton.me.

J. Michael Straczynski Is Being Upfront With Fans Over Potential Babylon 5 Revival Following Netflix's Warner Bros. Acquisition

2 janvier 2026 à 19:44

Babylon 5 fans are hoping Netflix’s big-money acquisition of Warner Bros. means the chances of a continuation of the much-loved sci-fi series will improve. But creator J. Michael Straczynski has calmed excitement, insisting there’s a long road ahead for any positive developments.

Warner Bros. owns Babylon 5, which has remained largely dormant since the iconic space opera ended in 1998 after five seasons. Despite efforts to get a revival off the ground, nothing new appears to be in the works, but some fans have expressed hope that Netflix may be interested in Babylon 5 should its deal to buy Warner Bros. goes through.

However, Straczynski outlined the many hurdles Babylon 5 must overcome before Netflix — or any company for that matter — might greenlight its return. As for now, there is nothing in the works. “The studio is contractually required to notify me if anything is put forward on B5,” Straczynski tweeted. “No such call has come.”

But would Netflix even be interested in Babylon 5 should it come to own it? Does Netflix need a sci-fi show right now? It would have plenty of competition within the Warner Bros. library even if Netflix decided to go down the sci-fi show route, Straczynski said.

“Yes B5 is a space/SF show and it's always good to have those,” Straczynski explained. “But the Warner IP also includes V, Flash Gordon, 2001, Firefly, Blade Runner, Gravity (both via acquisition), Forbidden Planet, Mad Max and the DC catalog among hundreds more. So let's see if the deal passes first.”

Straczynski is certainly keen, based on his tweets. “Nothing could make me happier if this happened, but things have to run their course: finalize the deal, get the show lists from Warners, check chain of title on prospects, review video sales, ratings, merchandise prospects, minimax profit reports, required elements, how much money various divisions can put in, what the prior worldwide distribution looked like… on and on and on… then and only then will they have a list of viable prospects to choose from,” he cautioned. “It's not ‘wouldn't it be cool if’... it's ‘how do we make money and control the property?’”

The upshot is, according to Straczynski, that more Babylon 5 is “a possibility, but that's all until the dust settles after the acquisition by Netflix. And Warners has a ton of other library titles. So we'll see, but again, this will take time.”

This isn’t the first time there has been talk of a Babylon 5 reboot. In 2021, The Hollywood Reporter said a "from-the-ground-up reboot" was in development for The CW with original creator Straczynski in place as writer and executive producer. This new version would have reportedly revolved around series protagonist John Sheridan as he takes command of Babylon 5 — a diplomatic station built in the wake of a devastating war with an advanced alien race.

So what happened to the reboot? Straczynski said it’s dead in the form that was described — that is, the CW reboot script is dead.

“The problem we ran into was three-fold: first, it's rare when network A picks up a show from another network unless it's been a big hit or it has major talent attached to it. That wasn't the case here it was just a script,” he explained. “Second, the well-documented paralysis that would grip Hollywood for the next several years was already starting to make itself known and buying was slowing down across the board. Third, that the project came from the CW was a liability with streamers who felt that a show that could air on the CW wouldn't work for them. But the studio believed in the project and felt it was important to try anyway.

“It took almost a year for the studio lawyers to claw back the rights to the scripts (different entities, lots of legal aspects), then lay out a plan for where to take it and who at that place should see it. (One twatcaster said the other studios had said no at the very moment when I was literally looking at an email with the last roster of names for submission in the coming months; meaning the other studios hadn't even *seen* it yet.) The studio took its best shot, but given the three issues noted above, we knew it was an uphill climb, and it bounced.”

So what does this mean for the future? “Actually, it doesn't mean anything one way or another,” Straczynski said. “Lots of TV shows go through whole slews of pilot scripts before one breaks through. It's commonplace. But you kind of have to wait a while before going back to the well. When that happens, there will be questions like: do we do a version of this that's network friendly, or for a streamer? Because as above, if you write for one you tend to preclude the other, as a CW script wouldn't work for one of them.”

But is a Babylon 5 reboot with another script possible? “Absolutely,” Straczynski insisted. “Not just possible but likely over time. The TV business is slowly starting to pull itself out of the malaise that's gripped it for the last five years, and there are a lot of deck chairs being moved around on a lot of boats, and you don't want to sell something to an exec who gets replaced in a sale because the new order will kill that project at once to put their own stamp on it. So there's merit in waiting.

“That said, do I think that the B5 universe will continue in one fashion or another, sooner or later, maybe sooner? Yes, I do. And when that should happen, I will break the news to the fans honestly and straightforwardly, just as I have for the last 30 years.”

Wesley is Director, News at IGN. Find him on Twitter at @wyp100. You can reach Wesley at wesley_yinpoole@ign.com or confidentially at wyp100@proton.me.

Netflix Reportedly Wants to Keep Movies in Theaters for Just 17 Days After It Buys Warner Bros.

2 janvier 2026 à 17:11

Netflix reportedly wants to keep movies in theaters for just 17 days after it buys Warner Bros.

In a report from Deadline on the Stranger Thing Season 5 finale, which made $25 million in theaters after it released at the same time theatrically as it did on Netflix, Hollywood was said to be worried about what the streamer considers to be “industry-standard windows” before movies are made available on its platform.

And then the bombshell:

Sources have told Deadline that Netflix have been proponents of a 17-day window which would steamroll the theatrical business, while circuits such as AMC believe the line needs to be held around 45 days.

It’s worth noting this isn’t confirmation that Netflix will settle on a 17-day window for Warner Bros. movies if and when its deal is approved. The theater companies may end up negotiating a lengthy window, perhaps somewhere between 45 days and the 17 days Netflix reportedly is a fan of. But what’s clear is that there will be a great deal of tension within Hollywood as this is all worked out, with Netflix’s priority — as you’d expect — bolstering streaming.

If Netflix does force through a 17-day window, it could affect everything from James Gunn's DC Universe movie, Man of Tomorrow (July 9, 2027), to The Lord of the Rings: The Hunt for Gollum (December 17, 2027). Then there's Matt Reeves' The Batman: Part 2, which is due out October 1, 2027, and Godzilla x Kong: Supernova, due out March 26, 2027. How would the likes of James Gunn, Andy Serkis, Matt Reeves and other directors of Warner Bros. movies react to their work having less than three weeks in theaters before hitting Netflix?

The $82.7 billion Netflix / Warner Bros. deal has sparked a tough response from some members of Congress, and it is expected to face significant scrutiny under antitrust laws. Meanwhile, at least one HBO Max subscriber has already sued Netflix, claiming the deal threatens to reduce competition in the U.S. subscription video-on-demand market. Warner Bros.-owned streaming platform HBO Max includes everything from Game of Thrones to Harry Potter, James Gunn's DC Universe to Barbie, and its content is expected to be added to Netflix if and when the deal goes through.

After its announcement, Netflix sent subscribers an email of reassurance amid concern over potential price rises. The email — reviewed by IGN — promised subscribers that nothing was changing “today,” and confirmed that HBO Max and Netflix would continue to operate separately until the deal closes. It did not rule out future price rises, but did promise that current membership plans would remain in place at least until the deal goes through. As for when that will be, Netflix said it expects to close the transaction in 12-18 months — so, at the earliest December 2026, but it could be as late as summer 2027.

In an investor call attended by IGN, Netflix chief Ted Sarandos struck a confident tone when asked about the deal’s chance of success. "We're highly confident in the regulatory process," he said. "This deal is pro-consumer, pro-innovation, pro-worker, it's pro-creator, it's pro-growth.”

As part of the same call, Sarandos said Netflix would continue to release Warner Bros. movies in theaters for now, though expected theatrical release windows to shorten over time to become "more user friendly."

"We've released about 30 films into theaters this year, so it's not like we have got this opposition to movies into theaters," Sarandos said. "My pushback has been mostly in the fact of the long, exclusive windows that we don't think are that user friendly."

"I wouldn't look at this as a change in approach for Netflix movies, or for Warner movies for that matter," Sarandos continued. "I think over time the windows will evolve to be much more consumer friendly, to be able to meet the audience where they are, quicker. All those things we'd like to do. But I'd say right now you should count on everything that is planned as going to the theaters through Warner Bros., will continue to go to the theaters through Warner Bros."

Last month, Rian Johnson expressed frustration at the limited theatrical release of his new Benoit Blanc Netflix film, Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery. Netflix released Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery in theaters on November 26, in time for the Thanksgiving holiday, before releasing it on Netflix itself on December 12. But it only released in “select” theaters, as opposed to nationwide — something that left the Star Wars: The Last Jedi writer and director unimpressed.

Meanwhile, Avatar director James Cameron has said Netflix buying Warner Bros. would be a “disaster.”

“Sorry, Ted [Sarandos], but geez,” he said on The Town podcast. “Sarandos has gone on the record saying theatrical films are dead. ‘Theatrical is dead. Quote, unquote.’” Indeed, Cameron remains unconvinced that Netflix would truly commit to any meaningful theatrical distribution if it expanded. “It’s sucker bait," he said. "‘We’ll put the movie out for a week or 10 days. We’ll qualify for Oscar consideration.’ See, I think that’s fundamentally rotten to the core. A movie should be made as a movie for theatrical, and the Academy Awards mean nothing to me if they don’t mean theatrical. I think they’ve been co-opted, and I think it’s horrific.”

That said, Cameron isn't opposed to Netflix playing the game if it actually, well, plays the game. “They should be allowed to compete if they put the movie out for a meaningful release in 2,000 theaters for a month,” Cameron noted.

One report has claimed Netflix is particularly keen to obtain Warner Bros.' vast content library as the streamer ramps up its potential to offer AI-generation tools and content in the future.

Wesley is Director, News at IGN. Find him on Twitter at @wyp100. You can reach Wesley at wesley_yinpoole@ign.com or confidentially at wyp100@proton.me.

'I Always Defend the Return of the King Epilogue' — Stranger Things Season 5 Finale's Lengthy Ending Inspired by The Lord of the Rings, Creators Say

2 janvier 2026 à 16:23

The Stranger Things Season 5 finale epilogue and its end credits were inspired by The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, creators the Duffer brothers have revealed.

Warning! Spoilers for Stranger Things Season 5 Episode 8, The Rightside Up, follow:

Stranger Things ends with Season 5 Episode 8, dubbed The Rightside Up, and an epilogue set 18 months after the events that showed the destruction of the Upside Down, the death of Vecna, the apparent death of Eleven, and the rescue of the kidnapped children.

We see relatively happy endings for pretty much all the main characters as they move on with their lives, kicking off with the core characters’ graduation from Hawkins High School. The show comes to a close with the end of the Dungeon and Dragons campaign that kicked off the Netflix series nine years ago, and the passing of the torch to a new generation of D&D fans made up of Holly Wheeler, Derek Turnbow, and more.

A decent chunk of the final episode’s 2-hour 8-minute runtime is devoted to this epilogue, which even finds room for a successful marriage proposal from David Harbour’s Jim Hopper to Winona Ryder’s Joyce Byers. Fans are then treated to end credits that show famous scenes as D&D illustrations, characters in the style of D&D character profiles, maps of locations from the show, and a final image showing Stranger Things as a D&D players manual.

the ending credits was so cool though #StrangerThings5 pic.twitter.com/63rHUdpFMD

— clueified 🤍 (@clueified) January 1, 2026

The epilogue and the end credits were inspired by The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, Matt and Ross Duffer told Deadline.

“We thought about [The Lord of the Rings] Return of the King a lot, just in terms of the length of the epilogue,” Matt Duffer said. “I always defend the Return of the King epilogue, but I’m one of those hardcore Lord of the Rings fans, to the point where I’ve watched all extended editions in a row on a single day. If you do that, the epilogue feels absolutely perfect and not long at all. In fact, if it felt shorter, it would feel absolutely distressing.

“I think, Stranger Things, if you watch Season 5 all the way through, it’s going to feel great. You just want to spend extra time with these characters. Anyway, that was sort of the reference for the epilogue. Then we love the credits at the end of Return of the King. So that was the initial idea, and they were these very simple illustrations.”

And on the end credits, Ross Duffer confirmed: “we wanted to be able to pay tribute to our cast and how much they’ve grown through the years. Obviously, it’s not to say the whole show was a D&D campaign. It was just a way to pay tribute to everyone and also let the audience, hopefully, take in this journey that they’ve been on for nine years.”

If you’ve watched The Return of the King you’ll know what the Duffers are talking about here. Peter Jackson’s epic trilogy ends with an epilogue set four years after the hobbits return to the Shire. Frodo leaves Middle-earth for the Undying Lands with Bilbo, Gandalf, and the remaining Elves. He gives Sam the Red Book of Westmarch, detailing their adventures, bids farewell to Sam, Merry, and Pippin, and departs. A saddened Sam returns home and is comforted by his family.

As for the end credits, The Return of the King shows the main characters in illustrative form, also as a goodbye following their extensive adventures.

We've got plenty more on Stranger Things, including the Duffer brothers explaining what they were going for with the Season 5 finale and Eleven's ending, and first details on the live-action spinoff.

Wesley is Director, News at IGN. Find him on Twitter at @wyp100. You can reach Wesley at wesley_yinpoole@ign.com or confidentially at wyp100@proton.me.

'Online, There's Just So Much Misinformation' — Stranger Things Creators Deny Claims of Netflix Interference as Season 5 'Snyder Cut' Petition Nears 400,000 Signatures

2 janvier 2026 à 14:08

The creators of Stranger Things have responded to a conspiracy theory that claims there exists a ‘Snyder Cut’ of Season 5 Volume 2 amid a petition with nearly 400,000 signatures.

Earlier this week, Stranger Things actor Randy Havens, who plays school teacher Mr. Clarke, pushed back on claims there is a secret 'Snyder cut' of Season 5 Volume 2, as a petition calling on Netflix and the show's creators the Duffer brothers to respond garnered hundreds of thousands of signatures online.

Ahead of the Stranger Things Season 5 finale on New Year’s Eve, Havens appeared to respond to an unverified, fan-made Google Doc detailing allegedly shortened storylines that had gained attention on social media. The Change.org petition that calls on Netflix to release the alleged “unseen footage” has over 378,000 signatures, at the time of this article’s publication.

The most-liked comment on the petition comes from someone who seems convinced that footage was cut from Season 5 Volume 2 for nefarious reasons. “We have been waiting since 2022 to see this last season,” they wrote. “To be robbed of scenes by Netflix which really could have gelled the show all together is absolutely unacceptable, and I speak on behalf of all fans that we have been betrayed for the show we love. We don’t sit down and do nothing, we need to show the Duffer brothers, Netflix, and especially Shawn Levy. We want our full episodes, we want the scenes which change everything. We want our show back.”

Stranger Things fans have slammed the petition and the Google Doc that appears to have inspired it, while praising Havens for hitting back on social media. Now, in a Variety interview, the Duffer brothers insisted the Google Doc is “obviously… not a real thing,” confirmed no scenes were cut from Season 5, and denied accusations of interference from Netflix.

“I don’t think there’s a single cut scene in the entire season,” Ross Duffer said, before Matt Duffer added: “The show has just grown so massive. Online, there’s just so much misinformation. Just tons of it. We would be here for hours trying to bat down the stuff that was not true. But at the end of the day, hopefully the work speaks for itself, and it is the show that Ross and I wanted to make. Netflix was, and has always been, incredible. I mean, there’s no interference or direction at all from them on us. They really trust us, and that’s been true from Season 1 on. It’s never changed, even though the show and the size of the audience have grown.”

Meanwhile, Stranger Things has suffered from review bombing after Season 5 Episode 7 met with lower audience scores than the Netflix series has typically seen. While the fifth and final season of Stranger Things had sparked complaints from some fans about the exposition-heavy writing, the varying quality of the actor's performances, and the plot armor some of their characters seemingly enjoy, Episode 7, called ‘The Bridge,’ became the focal point of a vociferous debate that spilled over into review aggregate websites.

Will Byers' coming out scene appears to have fueled this review bombing. In it, Will, played by Noah Schnapp, issues a lengthy monologue in which he tells a gathering of characters that he “doesn’t like girls.” The scene, which takes place as supervillain Vecna applies the finishing touches to his masterplan for world domination, ends with an emotional Will comforted by his friends.

The Duffer brothers were asked about the review bombing in the Variety interview, and explained Will’s coming out scene shouldn’t have come as a surprise. “The coming out scene is something we’ve been building to for nine years now,” Ross Duffer said. “It was a really important scene for us, and a really important scene for Noah — not just from a thematic point of view, but also a narrative point of view. This show has always been about our characters overcoming evil, and in order to overcome this evil, Vecna, in so many ways, represents all the dark thoughts and the evil of society. And for our characters to overcome that, it really becomes about embracing themselves, and then also embracing one another and coming together.”

Matt Duffer called the scene “the final step in Will’s journey.” He continued: “and Will is, in so many ways, the key to defeating Vecna. Volume 1 is really about self-acceptance, right? I mean, that’s sort of step one. And then step two is Will is talking to Robin — it’s something that he wants to do. He’s trying to figure out how to come out, and he knows that he needs to do that, and that that’s the final step for him. And he finds the courage to be able to do it. And it’s really the ultimate fuck you to Vecna. That was the intention.”

As for the review bombing campaign, Matt Duffer said the creators were not prepared for it. “Because it is, as Ross said, something we’ve been building for a really long time. I always say, Ross and I are many things, but subtle is not one of those things!”

Matt revealed that he’s been texting with Noah Schnapp after the coming out scene aired, “and he’s in a really good place. He’s very proud of the scene, and we’re proud of the scene.”

We've got plenty more on Stranger Things, including the Duffer brothers explaining what they were going for with the Season 5 finale and Eleven's ending, and first details on the live-action spinoff.

Wesley is Director, News at IGN. Find him on Twitter at @wyp100. You can reach Wesley at wesley_yinpoole@ign.com or confidentially at wyp100@proton.me.

Stranger Things Spinoff Will Answer What's Inside the Briefcase and Other 'Loose Threads' From the Season 5 Finale, Duffer Brothers Promise

2 janvier 2026 à 12:54

If you’re all caught up on Stranger Things, you’ll be aware of a plot thread left dangling in the Season 5 finale that has to do with a briefcase. It turns out this will be addressed in a live-action Stranger Things spinoff — although there’s no word when.

Warning! Spoilers for Stranger Things Season 5 Episode 8, The Rightside Up, follow:

In the Season 5 finale, we see Henry Creel / Vecna finally face his greatest fear: the traumatic memory of the day he was infected by the Mind Flayer and gained his powers. In this scene set inside Henry’s mind, we finally find out what was inside the briefcase that child Henry opens after bludgeoning its previous owner, an unnamed scientist, to death. Inside is a mysterious rock, which glows with an unknown energy before fusing with Henry. This, we understand, is how Henry became one with the Mind Flayer, and sets in motion all the events of Stranger Things that followed.

But what was this rock exactly, and how did it come to be in our world in the first place? An article on Netflix confirms the rock contains Mind Flayer particles, which then possess Henry. “Come find me,” the Mind Flayer beckons. And the dying scientist warns: “It will consume you.”

In a subsequent interview with Variety, Stranger Things co-creators Matt and Ross Duffer teased that the planned spinoff will explain all — and answer other plot threads left dangling.

“The spinoff is going to delve into that and explain that, and you’re going to understand it,” Matt Duffer said of the briefcase rock. “But it’s a completely different mythology. So it’s not a deep exploration of the Mind Flayer or anything like that. It’s very fresh and very new, but yes, it will answer some of the loose threads that are remaining.”

The briefcase scene is explained in vague terms by Stranger Things: The First Shadow, the canon play that acts as a prequel to the events of the Netflix show. We've run through the plot of the play already, but in summary, it confirms that Henry and the scientist are transported to what was then known as Dimension X. When Henry returns, he is much changed, and Dr. Brenner (Matthew Modine) eventually uses him as part of his experiments in Hawkins National Laboratory.

But even before then, the play tells us of a 1943 United States experiment to turn submarines invisible during World War 2. As part of this, they travel to Dimension X. Perhaps that's where the mysterious rock originally came from, and how it ended up in our world in the first place.

Either way, we will get an answer to the briefcase rock in the spinoff show, although we’re very light on the details. The Duffer brothers are working on it as we speak, and described it as a “clean slate.”

“Completely new characters, new town, new world, new mythology,” Matt Duffer said, adding: “No common characters.”

If the spinoff is going to explain the briefcase rock, it seems likely it will in part be set in the 1950s. But other than that, it’s anyone’s guess. Netflix actually has two announced Stranger Things spinoffs in development, the first of which is Stranger Things: Tales From ’85, a new animated series due out at some point this year. This is set in the same universe between Seasons 2 and 3, and follows the original characters as they “fight new monsters and unravel a paranormal mystery terrorizing their town.” The second spinoff, which the Duffer brothers are referring to above, is an unnamed live-action series.

We’ve got plenty more on Stranger Things, including the Duffer brothers explaining the ambiguity of Eleven’s ending.

Image credit: Netflix.

Wesley is Director, News at IGN. Find him on Twitter at @wyp100. You can reach Wesley at wesley_yinpoole@ign.com or confidentially at wyp100@proton.me.

'We Just Thought It Was Such a Better Way to End the Story' — Stranger Things Creators Explain What They Were Going for With the Season 5 Finale and Eleven's Ending

2 janvier 2026 à 12:06

Stranger Things creators the Duffer brothers have explained the Season 5 finale and its ending, which has sparked much debate among fans.

Warning! Spoilers for Stranger Things Season 5 Episode 8, The Rightside Up, follow:

Stranger Things ends with a definitive wave goodbye to all the central characters except Eleven, played by Millie Bobby Brown, who appears to sacrifice herself to ensure she cannot be used to create super weapons, another Vecna / Henry, or another bridge between our world and The Abyss.

18 months after that traumatic event, we see the central characters meet up for graduation and say their goodbyes. It’s at this point that Mike Wheeler, played by Finn Wolfhard, has a thought: what if Kali Prasad, also known as Eight (Linnea Berthelsen), used her dying breath to create the illusion of Eleven’s death, and an invisibility spell on Eleven herself, leaving her free to escape unseen?

Mike teases this revelation to the Dungeons & Dragons group as their final campaign comes to an end, suggesting Eleven cooked up a plan with Kali to fake her own death, then traveled to a far away small village — bordered by three waterfalls — to live out her days in peace. But this ending is unconfirmed. Mike and the others choose to believe it, and it’s left up to the audience to decide what they choose to believe as Stranger Things finally comes to an end.

So, why did Matt and Ross Duffer decide to leave Eleven’s ending on such an ambiguous note? Netflix published a Q&A with the brothers to accompany the season finale, and in it they explained what they were going for here.

“What we wanted to do was confront the reality of what her situation was after all of this and how could she live a normal life,” Matt Duffer said. “These are the questions that we’ve been posing this season that Hopper just doesn’t even want to think or talk about. Mike’s obviously talked about it a lot, but it’s sort of this fantasy version that would never work. There are two roads that Eleven could take. There’s this darker, more pessimistic one or the optimistic, hopeful one. Mike is the optimist of the group and has chosen to believe in that story.”

Ross Duffer added: “There was never a version of the story where Eleven was hanging out with the gang at the end. For us and our writers, we didn’t want to take her powers away. She represents magic in a lot of ways and the magic of childhood. For our characters to move on and for the story of Hawkins and the Upside Down to come to a close, Eleven had to go away. We thought it would be beautiful if our characters continued to believe in that happier ending even if we didn’t give them a clear answer to whether that’s true or not. The fact that they’re believing in it, we just thought it was such a better way to end the story and a better way to represent the closure of this journey and their journey from children to adults.”

“And the reality is, if Eleven is out there, the most that they could hope for is a belief that it’s true because they can’t be in contact with her,” Matt concluded. “Everything falls apart if that were the case. So if that’s the narrative, this is really the best way to keep her alive. And it’s about Mike and everyone finding a way to move past what’s happened.”

It sounds like Eleven’s ending will never be resolved, but there is more Stranger Things to come via a spinoff with completely new characters, a new town, and a new mythology. And if you’re now feeling at a loss for what to watch this year, check out The Biggest TV Shows Coming to Every Streaming Service in 2026.

Wesley is Director, News at IGN. Find him on Twitter at @wyp100. You can reach Wesley at wesley_yinpoole@ign.com or confidentially at wyp100@proton.me.

❌