Circularly polarized (CP) light is encoded with information through its photon spin and can be utilized in applications such as low-power displays, encrypted communications and quantum technologies. Organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs) produce CP light with a left or right “handedness”, depending on the chirality of the light-emitting molecules used to create the device.

While OLEDs usually only emit either left- or right-handed CP light, researchers have now developed OLEDs that can electrically switch between emitting left- or right-handed CP light – without needing different molecules for each handedness.

“We had recently identified an alternative mechanism for the emission of circularly polarized light in OLEDs, using our chiral polymer materials, which we called anomalous circularly polarized electroluminescence,” says lead author Matthew Fuchter from the University of Oxford. “We set about trying to better understand the interplay between this new mechanism and the generally established mechanism for circularly polarized emission in the same chiral materials”.

Light handedness controlled by molecular chirality

The CP light handedness of an organic emissive molecule is controlled by its chirality. A chiral molecule is one that has two mirror-image structural isomers that can’t be superimposed on top of each other. Each of these non-superimposable molecules is called an enantiomer, and will absorb, emit and refract CP light with a defined spin angular momentum. Each enantiomer will produce CP light with a different handedness, through an optical mechanism called normal circularly polarized electroluminescence (NCPE).

OLED designs typically require access to both enantiomers, but most chemical synthesis processes will produce racemic mixtures (equal amounts of the two enantiomers) that are difficult to separate. Extracting each enantiomer so that they can be used individually is complex and expensive, but the research at Oxford has simplified this process by using a molecule that can switch between emitting left- and right-handed CP light.

The molecule in question is a helical molecule called (P)-aza[6]helicene, which is the right-handed enantiomer. Even though it is just a one-handed form, the researchers found a way to control the handedness of the OLED, enabling it to switch between both forms.

Switching handedness without changing the structure

The researchers designed the helicene molecules so that the handedness of the light could be switched electrically, without needing to change the structure of the material itself. “Our work shows that either handedness can be accessed from a single-handed chiral material without changing the composition or thickness of the emissive layer,” says Fuchter. “From a practical standpoint, this approach could have advantages in future circularly polarized OLED technologies.”

Instead of making a structural change, the researchers changed the way that the electric charges are recombined in the device, using interlayers to alter the recombination position and charge carrier mobility inside the device. Depending on where the recombination zone is located, this leads to situations where there is balanced or unbalanced charge transport, which then leads to different handedness of CP light in the device.

When the recombination zone is located in the centre of the emissive layer, the charge transport is balanced, which generates an NCPE mechanism. In these situations, the helicene adopts its normal handedness (right handedness).

However, when the recombination zone is located close to one of the transport layers, it creates an unbalanced charge transport mechanism called anomalous circularly polarized electroluminescence (ACPE). The ACPE overrides the NCPE mechanism and inverts the handedness of the device to left handedness by altering the balance of induced orbital angular momentum in electrons versus holes. The presence of these two electroluminescence mechanisms in the device enables it to be controlled electrically by tuning the charge carrier mobility and the recombination zone position.

The research allows the creation of OLEDs with controllable spin angular momentum information using a single emissive enantiomer, while probing the fundamental physics of chiral optoelectronics. “This work contributes to the growing body of evidence suggesting further rich physics at the intersection of chirality, charge and spin. We have many ongoing projects to try and understand and exploit such interplay,” Fuchter concludes.

The researchers describe their findings in Nature Photonics.

The post Organic LED can electrically switch the handedness of emitted light appeared first on Physics World.

Physicist, molecular biologist, neuroscientist: Francis Crick’s scientific career took many turns. And now, he is the subject of zoologist Matthew Cobb’s new book, Crick: a Mind in Motion – from DNA to the Brain.

Born in 1916, Crick studied physics at University College London in the mid-1930s, before working for the Admiralty Research Laboratory during the Second World War. But after reading physicist Erwin Schrödinger’s 1944 book What Is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell, and a 1946 article on the structure of biological molecules by chemist Linus Pauling, Crick left his career in physics and switched to molecular biology in 1947.

Six years later, while working at the University of Cambridge, he played a key role in decoding the double-helix structure of DNA, working in collaboration with biologist James Watson, biophysicist Maurice Wilkins and other researchers including chemist and X-ray crystallographer Rosalind Franklin. Crick, alongside Watson and Wilkins, went on to receive the 1962 Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine for the discovery.

Finally, Crick’s career took one more turn in the mid-1970s. After experiencing a mental health crisis, Crick left Britain and moved to California. He took up neuroscience in an attempt to understand the roots of human consciousness, as discussed in his 1994 book, The Astonishing Hypothesis: the Scientific Search for the Soul.

Parallel lives

When he died in 2004, Crick’s office wall at Salk Institute in La Jolla, US, carried portraits of Charles Darwin and Albert Einstein, as Cobb notes on the final page of his deeply researched and intellectually fascinating biography. But curiously, there is not a single other reference to Einstein in Cobb’s massive book. Furthermore, there is no reference at all to Einstein in the equally large 2009 biography of Crick, Francis Crick: Hunter of Life’s Secrets, by historian of science Robert Olby, who – unlike Cobb – knew Crick personally.

Nevertheless, a comparison of Crick and Einstein is illuminating. Crick’s family background (in the shoe industry), and his childhood and youth are in some ways reminiscent of Einstein’s. Both physicists came from provincial business families of limited financial success, with some interest in science yet little intellectual distinction. Both did moderately well at school and college, but were not academic stars. And both were exposed to established religion, but rejected it in their teens; they had little intrinsic respect for authority, without being open rebels until later in life.

The similarities continue into adulthood, with the two men following unconventional early scientific careers. Both of them were extroverts who loved to debate ideas with fellow scientists (at times devastatingly), although they were equally capable of long, solitary periods of concentration throughout their careers. In middle age, they migrated from their home countries – Germany (Einstein) and Britain (Crick) – to take up academic positions in the US, where they were much admired and inspiring to other scientists, but failed to match their earlier scientific achievements.

In their personal lives, both Crick and Einstein had a complicated history with women. Having divorced their first wives, they had a variety of extramarital affairs – as discussed by Cobb without revealing the names of these women – while remaining married to their second wives. Interestingly, Crick’s second wife, Odile Crick (whom he was married to for 55 years) was an artist, and drew the famous schematic drawing of the double helix published in Nature in 1953.

Stories of friendships

Although Cobb misses this fascinating comparison with Einstein, many other vivid stories light up his book. For example, he recounts Watson’s claim that just after their success with DNA in 1953, “Francis winged into the Eagle [their local pub in Cambridge] to tell everyone within hearing distance that we had found the secret of life” – a story that later appeared on a plaque outside the pub.

“Francis always denied he said anything of the sort,” notes Cobb, “and in 2016, at a celebration of the centenary of Crick’s birth, Watson publicly admitted that he had made it up for dramatic effect (a few years earlier, he had confessed as much to Kindra Crick, Francis’s granddaughter).” No wonder Watson’s much-read 1968 book The Double Helix caused a furious reaction from Crick and a temporary breakdown in their friendship, as Cobb dissects in excoriating detail.

Watson’s deprecatory comments on Franklin helped to provoke the current widespread belief that Crick and Watson succeeded by stealing Franklin’s data. After an extensive analysis of the available evidence, however, Cobb argues that the data was willingly shared with them by Franklin, but that they should have formally asked her permission to use it in their published work – “Ambition, or thoughtlessness, stayed their hand.”

In fact, it seems Crick and Franklin were friends in 1953, and remained so – with Franklin asking Crick for his advice on her draft scientific papers – until her premature death from ovarian cancer in 1958. Indeed, after her first surgery in 1956, Franklin went to stay with Crick and his wife at their house in Cambridge, and then returned to them after her second operation. There certainly appears to be no breakdown in trust between the two. When Crick was nominated for the Nobel prize in 1961, he openly stated, “The data which really helped us obtain the structure was mainly obtained by Rosalind Franklin.”

As for Crick’s later study of consciousness, Cobb comments, “It would be easy to dismiss Crick’s switch to studying the brain as the quixotic project of an ageing scientist who did not know his limits. After all, he did not make any decisive breakthrough in understanding the brain – nothing like the double helix… But then again, nobody else did, in Crick’s lifetime or since.” One is perhaps reminded once again of Einstein, and his preoccupation during later life with his unified field theory, which remains an open line of research today.

• 2025 Profile Books £30.00hb 595pp

The post Francis Crick: a life of twists and turns appeared first on Physics World.

Rob Farr is a theorist and computer modeller whose career has taken him down an unconventional path. He studied physics at the University of Cambridge, UK, from 1991 to 1994, staying on to do a PhD in statistical physics. But while many of his contemporaries then went into traditional research fields – such as quantum science, high-energy physics and photonic technologies – Farr got a taste for the food and drink manufacturing industry. It’s a multidisciplinary field in which Farr has worked for more than 25 years.

After leaving academia in 1998, first stop was Unilever’s €13bn foods division. For two decades, latterly as a senior scientist, Farr guided R&D teams working across diverse lines of enquiry – “doing the science, doing the modelling”, as he puts it. Along the way, Farr worked on all manner of consumer products including ice-cream, margarine and non-dairy spreads, as well as “dry” goods such as bouillon cubes. There was also the occasional foray into cosmetics, skin creams and other non-food products.

As a theoretical physicist working in industrial-scale food production, Farr’s focus has always been on the materials science of the end-product and how it gets processed. “Put simply,” says Farr, “that means making production as efficient as possible – regarding both energy and materials use – while developing ‘new customer experiences’ in terms of food taste, texture and appearance.” 

Ice-cream physics

One tasty multiphysics problem that preoccupied Farr for a good chunk of his time at Unilever is ice cream. It is a hugely complex material that Farr likens to a high-temperature ceramic, in the sense that the crystalline part of it is stored very near to the melting point of ice. “Equally, the non-ice phase contains fats,” he says, “so there’s all sorts of emulsion physics and surface science to take into consideration.”

Ice cream also has polymers in the mix, so theoretical modelling needs to incorporate the complex physics of polymer–polymer phase separation as well as polymer flow, or “rheology”, which contributes to the product’s texture and material properties. “Air is another significant component of ice cream,” adds Farr, “which means it’s a foam as well as an emulsion.”

As well as trying to understand how all these subcomponents interact, there’s also the thorny issue of storage. After it’s produced, ice cream is typically kept at low temperatures of about –25 °C – first in the factory, then in transit and finally in a supermarket freezer. But once that tub of salted-caramel or mint choc chip reaches a consumer’s home, it’s likely to be popped in the ice compartment of a fridge freezer at a much milder –6 or –7 °C.

Manufacturers therefore need to control how those temperature transitions affect the recrystallization of ice. This unwanted outcome can lead to phenomena like “sintering” (which makes a harder product) and “ripening” (which can lead to big ice crystals that can be detected in the mouth and detract from the creamy texture).

“Basically, the whole panoply of soft-matter physics comes into play across the production, transport and storage of ice cream,” says Farr. “Figuring out what sort of materials systems will lead to better storage stability or a more consistent product texture are non-trivial questions given that the global market for ice cream is worth in excess of €100bn annually.”

A shot of coffee?

After almost 20 years working at Unilever, in 2017 Farr took up a role as coffee science expert at JDE Peet’s, the Dutch multinational coffee and tea company. Switching from the chilly depths of ice cream science to the dark arts of coffee production and brewing might seem like a steep career phase change, but the physics of the former provides a solid bridge to the latter.

The overlap is evident, for example, in how instant coffee gets freeze-dried – a low-temperature dehydration process that manufacturers use to extend the shelf-life of perishable materials and make them easier to transport. In the case of coffee, freeze drying (or lyophilization, as it’s commonly known) also helps to retain flavour and aromas.

If you want to study a parameter space that’s not been explored before, the only way to do that is to simulate the core processes using fundamental physics

After roasting and grinding the raw coffee beans, manufacturers extract a coffee concentrate using high pressure and water. This extract is then frozen, ground up and placed in a vacuum well below 0 °C. A small amount of heat is applied to sublime the ice away and remove the remaining water from the non-ice phase.

The quality of the resulting freeze-dried instant coffee is better than ordinary instant coffee. However, freeze-drying is also a complex and expensive process, which manufacturers seek to fine-tune by implementing statistical methods to optimize, for example, the amount of energy consumed during production.

Such approaches involve interpolating the gaps between existing experimental data sets, which is where a physics mind-set comes in. “If you want to study a parameter space that’s not been explored before,” says Farr, “the only way to do that is to simulate the core processes using fundamental physics.”

Beyond the production line, Farr has also sought to make coffee more stable when it’s stored at home. Sustainability is the big driver here: JDE Peet’s has committed to make all its packaging compostable, recyclable or reusable by 2030. “Shelf-life prediction has been a big part of this R&D initiative,” he explains. “The work entails using materials science and the physics of mass transfer to develop next-generation packaging and container systems.”

Line of sight

After eight years unpacking the secrets of coffee physics at JDE Peet’s, Farr was given the option to relocate to the Netherlands in mid-2025 as part of a wider reorganization of the manufacturer’s corporate R&D function. However, he decided to stay put in Oxford and is now deciding between another role in the food manufacturing sector, or moving into a new area of research, such as nuclear energy, or even education.

Farr believes he gained a lot from his time at JDE Peet’s. As well as studying a wide range of physics problems, he also benefited from the company’s rigorous approach to R&D, whereby projects are regularly assessed for profitability and quickly killed off if they don’t make the cut. Such prioritization avoids wasted effort and investment, but it also demands agility from staff scientists, who have to build long-term research strategies against a project landscape in constant flux.

A senior scientist needs to be someone who colleagues come to informally to discuss their technical challenges

To thrive in that setting, Farr says collaboration and an open mind are essential. “A senior scientist needs to be someone who colleagues come to informally to discuss their technical challenges,” he says. “You can then find the scientific question which underpins seemingly disparate problems and work with colleagues to deliver commercially useful solutions.” For Farr, it’s a self-reinforcing dynamic. “As more people come to you, the more helpful you become – and I love that way of working.”

What Farr calls “line-of-sight” is another unique feature of industrial R&D in food materials. “Maybe you’re only building one span of a really long bridge,” he notes, “but when you can see the process end-to-end, as well as your part in in it, that is a fantastic motivator.” Indeed, Farr believes that for physicists who want a job doing something useful, the physics of food materials makes a great career. “There are,” he concludes, “no end of intriguing and challenging research questions.”

The post A theoretical physicist’s journey through the food and drink industry appeared first on Physics World.

The ability to continuously monitor and interpret foetal movement patterns in the third trimester of a pregnancy could help detect any potential complications and improve foetal wellbeing. Currently, however, such assessment of foetal movement is performed only periodically, with an ultrasound exam at a hospital or clinic.

A lightweight, easily wearable, adhesive patch-based sensor developed by engineers and obstetricians at Monash University in Australia may change this. The patches, two of which are worn on the abdomen, can detect foetal movements such as kicking, waving, hiccups, breathing, twitching, and head and trunk motion.

Reduced foetal movement can be associated with potential impairment in the central nervous system and musculoskeletal system, and is a common feature observed in pregnancies that end in foetal death and stillbirth. A foetus compromised in utero may reduce movements as a compensatory strategy to lower oxygen consumption and conserve energy.

To help identify foetuses at risk of complications, the Monash team developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered wearable pressure–strain combo sensor system that continuously and accurately detects foetal movement-induced motion in the mother’s abdominal skin. As reported in Science Advances, the “band-aid”-like sensors can discriminate between foetal and non-foetal movement with over 90% accuracy.

The system comprises two soft, thin and flexible patches designed to conform to the abdomen of a pregnant woman. One patch incorporates an octagonal gold nanowire-based strain sensor (the “Octa” sensor), the other is an interdigitated electrode-based pressure sensor.

The patches feature a soft polyimide-based flexible printed circuit (FPC) that integrates a thin lithium polymer battery and various integrated circuit chips, including a Bluetooth radiofrequency system for reading the sensor’s electrical resistance, storing data and communicating with a smartphone app. Each patch is encapsulated with kinesiology tape and sticks to the abdomen using a medical double-sided silicone adhesive.

The Octa sensor is attached to a separate FPC connector attached to the primary device, enabling easy replacement after each study. The pressure sensor is mounted on the silicone adhesive, to connect with the interdigitated electrode beneath the primary device. The Octa and pressure sensor patches are lightweight (about 3 g) and compact, measuring 63 x 30 x 4 mm and 62 x 28 x 2 mm, respectively.

Trialling the device

The researchers validated their foetal movement monitoring system via comparison with simultaneous ultrasound exams, examining 59 healthy pregnant women at Monash Health. Each participant had the pressure sensor attached to the area of their abdomen where they felt the most vigorous foetal movements, typically in the lower quadrant, while the strain sensor was attached to the region closest to foetal limbs. An accelerometer placed on the participant’s chest captured non-foetal movement data for signal denoising and training the machine-learning model.

Principal investigator Wenlong Cheng, now at the University of Sydney, and colleagues report that “the wearable strain sensor featured isotropic omnidirectional sensitivity, enabling detection of maternal abdominal [motion] over a large area, whereas the wearable pressure sensor offered high sensitivity with a small domain, advantageous for accurate localized foetal movement detection”.

The researchers note that the pressure sensor demonstrated higher sensitivity to movements directly beneath it compared with motion farther away, while the Octa sensor performed consistently across a wider sensing area. “The combination of both sensor types resulted in a substantial performance enhancement, yielding an overall AUROC [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve] accuracy of 92.18% in binary detection of foetal movement, illustrating the potential of combining diverse sensing modalities to achieve more accurate and reliable monitoring outcomes,” they write.

In a press statement, co-author Fae Marzbanrad explains that the device’s strength lies in a combination of soft sensing materials, intelligent signal processing and AI. “Different foetal movements create distinct strain patterns on the abdominal surface, and these are captured by the two sensors,” she says. “The machine-learning system uses the signals to detect when movement occurs while cancelling maternal movements.”

The lightweight and flexible device can be worn by pregnant women for long periods without disrupting daily life. “By integrating sensor data with AI, the system automatically captures a wider range of foetal movements than existing wearable concepts while staying compact and comfortable,” Marzbanrad adds.

The next steps towards commercialization of the sensors will include large-scale clinical studies in out-of-hospital settings, to evaluate foetal movements and investigate the relationship between movement patterns and pregnancy complications.

The post Band-aid like wearable sensor continuously monitors foetal movement appeared first on Physics World.

Since the beginning of radiation therapy, almost all treatments have been delivered with the patient lying on a table while the beam rotates around them. But a resurgence in upright patient positioning is changing that paradigm. Novel radiation accelerators such as proton therapy, VHEE, and FLASH therapy are often too large to rotate around the patient, making access limited. By instead rotating the patient, these previously hard-to-access beams could now become mainstream in the future.

Join leading clinicians and experts as they discuss how this shift in patient positioning is enabling exploration of new treatment geometries and supporting the development of advanced future cancer therapies.

Novel beams covered and their representative speaker

Serdar Charyyev – Proton Therapy – Clinical Assistant Professor at Stanford University School of Medicine
Eric Deutsch – VHEE FLASH – Head of Radiotherapy at Gustave Roussy
Bill Loo – FLASH Photons – Professor of Radiation Oncology at Stanford Medicine
Rock Mackie – Emeritus Professor at University of Wisconsin and Co-Founder and Chairman of Leo Cancer Care

The post Unlocking novel radiation beams for cancer treatment with upright patient positioning appeared first on Physics World.

Despite not being close to the frontline of Russia’s military assault on Ukraine, life at the Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas is far from peaceful. “While we continue teaching and research, we operate under constant uncertainty – air raid alerts, electricity outages – and the emotional toll on staff and students,” says Lidiia Davybida, an associate professor of geodesy and land management.

Last year, the university became a target of a Russian missile strike, causing extensive damage to buildings that still has not been fully repaired – although, fortunately, no casualties were reported. The university also continues to leak staff and students to the war effort – some of whom will tragically never return – while new student numbers dwindle as many school graduates leave Ukraine to study abroad.

Despite these major challenges, Davybida and her colleagues remain resolute. “We adapt – moving lectures online when needed, adjusting schedules, and finding ways to keep research going despite limited opportunities and reduced funding,” she says.

Resolute research

Davybida’s research focuses on environmental monitoring using geographic information systems (GIS), geospatial analysis and remote sensing. She has been using these techniques to monitor the devastating impact that the war is having on the environment and its significant contribution to climate change.

In 2023 she published results from using Sentinel-5P satellite data and Google Earth Engine to monitor the air quality impacts of war on Ukraine (IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 1254 012112). As with the COVID-19 lockdowns worldwide, her results reveal that levels of common pollutants such as carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide and sulphur dioxide were, on average, down from pre-invasion levels. This reflects the temporary disruption to economic activity that war has brought on the country.

More worrying, from an environment and climate perspective, were the huge concentrations of aerosols, smoke and dust in the atmosphere. “High ozone concentrations damage sensitive vegetation and crops,” Davybida explains. “Aerosols generated by explosions and fires may carry harmful substances such as heavy metals and toxic chemicals, further increasing environmental contamination.” She adds that these pollutants can alter sunlight absorption and scattering, potentially disrupting local climate and weather patterns, and contributing to long-term ecological imbalances.

A significant toll has been wrought by individual military events too. A prime example is Russia’s destruction of the Kakhovka Dam in southern Ukraine in June 2023. An international team – including Ukrainian researchers – recently attempted to quantify this damage by combining on-the-ground field surveys, remote-sensing data and hydrodynamic modelling; a tool they used for predicting water flow and pollutant dispersion.

The results of this work are sobering (Science 387 1181). Though 80% of the ecosystem is expected to re-establish itself within five years, the dam’s destruction released as much as 1.7 cubic kilometres of sediment contaminated by a host of persistent pollutants, including nitrogen, phosphorous and 83,000 tonnes of heavy metals. Discharging this toxic sludge across the land and waterways will have unknown long-term environmental consequences for the region, as the contaminants could be spread by future floods, the researchers concluded (figure 1).

Dangerous data

A large part of the reason for the researchers’ uncertainty, and indeed more general uncertainty in environmental and climate impacts of war, stems from data scarcity. It is near-impossible for scientists to enter an active warzone to collect samples and conduct surveys and experiments. Environmental monitoring stations also get damaged and destroyed during conflict, explains Davybida – a wrong she is attempting to right in her current work. Many efforts to monitor, measure and hopefully mitigate the environmental and climate impact of the war in Ukraine are therefore less direct.

In 2022, for example, climate-policy researcher Mathijs Harmsen from the PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency and international collaborators decided to study the global energy crisis (which was sparked by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine) to look at how the war will alter climate policy (Environ. Res. Lett. 19 124088).

They did this by plugging in the most recent energy price, trade and policy data (up to May 2023) into an integrated assessment model that simulates the environmental consequences of human activities worldwide. They then imposed different potential scenarios and outcomes and let it run to 2030 and 2050. Surprisingly, all scenarios led to a global reduction of 1–5% of carbon dioxide emissions by 2030, largely due to trade barriers increasing fossil fuel prices, which in turn would lead to increased uptake of renewables.

But even though the sophisticated model represents the global energy system in detail, some factors are hard to incorporate and some actions can transform the picture completely, argues Harmsen. “Despite our results, I think the net effect of this whole war is a negative one, because it doesn’t really build trust or add to any global collaboration, which is what we need to move to a more renewable world,” he says. “Also, the recent intensification of Ukraine’s ‘kinetic sanctions’ [attacks on refineries and other fossil fuel infrastructure] will likely have a larger effect than anything we explored in our paper.”

Elsewhere, Toru Kobayakawa was, until recently, working for the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), leading the Ukraine support team. Kobayakawa used a non-standard method to more realistically estimate the carbon footprint of reconstructing Ukraine when the war ends (Environ. Res.: Infrastruct. Sustain. 5 015015). The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and other international bodies only account for carbon emissions within the territorial country. “The consumption-based model I use accounts for the concealed carbon dioxide from the production of construction materials like concrete and steel imported from outside of the country,” he says.

Using an open-source database Eora26 that tracks financial flows between countries’ major economic sectors in simple input–output tables, Kobayakawa calculated that Ukraine’s post-war reconstruction will amount to 741 million tonnes carbon dioxide equivalent over 10 years. This is 4.1 times Ukraine’s pre-war annual carbon-dioxide emissions, or the combined annual emissions of Germany and Austria.

However, as with most war-related findings, these figures come with a caveat. “Our input–output model doesn’t take into account the current situation,” notes Kobayakawa “It is the worst-case scenario.” Nevertheless, the research has provided useful insights, such as that the Ukrainian construction industry will account for 77% of total emissions.

“Their construction industry is notorious for inefficiency, needing frequent rework, which incurs additional costs, as well as additional carbon-dioxide emissions,” he says. “So, if they can improve efficiency by modernizing construction processes and implementing large-scale recycling of construction materials, that will contribute to reducing emissions during the reconstruction phase and ensure that they build back better.”

Military emissions gap

As the experiences of Davybida, Harmsen and Kobayakawa show, cobbling together relevant and reliable data in the midst of war is a significant challenge, from which only limited conclusions can be drawn. Researchers and policymakers need a fuller view of the environmental and climate cost of war if they are to improve matters once a conflict ends.

That’s certainly the view of Benjamin Neimark, who studies geopolitical ecology at Queen Mary University of London. He has been trying for some time to tackle the fact that the biggest data gap preventing accurate estimates of the climate and environmental cost of war is military emissions. During the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26), for example, he and colleagues partnered with the Conflict and Environment Observatory (CEOBS) to launch The Military Emissions Gap, a website to track and trace what a country accounts for as its military emissions to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

At present, reporting military emissions is voluntary, so data are often absent or incomplete – but gathering such data is vital. According to a 2022 estimate extrapolated from the small number of nations that do share their data, the total military carbon footprint is approximately 5.5% of global emissions. This would make the world’s militaries the fourth biggest carbon emitter if they were a nation.

The website is an attempt to fill this gap. “We hope that the UNFCCC picks up on this and mandates transparent and visible reporting of military emissions,” Neimark says (figure 2).

Measuring the destruction

Beyond plugging the military emissions gap, Neimark is also involved in developing and testing methods that he and other researchers can use to estimate the overall climate impact of war. Building on foundational work from his collaborator, Dutch climate specialist Lennard de Klerk – who developed a methodology for identifying, classifying and providing ways of estimating the various sources of emissions associated with the Russia–Ukraine war – Neimark and colleagues are trying to estimate the greenhouse-gas emissions from the Israel–Gaza conflict.

Their studies encompass pre-conflict preparation, the conflict itself and post-conflict reconstruction. “We were working with colleagues who were doing similar work in Ukraine, but every war is different,” says Neimark. “In Ukraine, they don’t have large tunnel networks, or they didn’t, and they don’t have this intensive, incessant onslaught of air strikes from carbon-intensive F16 fighter aircraft.” Some of these factors, like the carbon impact of Hamas’ underground maze of tunnels under Gaza, seem unquantifiable, but Neimark has found a way.

“There’s some pretty good data for how big these are in terms of height, the amount of concrete, how far down they’re dug and how thick they are,” says Neimark. “It’s just the length we had to work out based on reported documentation.” Finding the total amount of concrete and steel used in these tunnels involved triangulating open-source information with media reports to finalize an estimate of the dimensions of these structures. Standard emission factors could then be applied to obtain the total carbon emissions. According to data from Neimark’s Confronting Military Greenhouse Gas Emissions report, the carbon emissions from construction of concrete infrastructure by both Israel and Hamas were more than the annual emissions of 33 individual countries and territories (figure 3).

The impact of Hamas’ tunnels and Israel’s “iron wall” border fence are just two of many pre-war activities that must be factored in to estimate the Israel–Gaza conflict’s climate impact. Then, the huge carbon cost of the conflict itself must be calculated, including, for example, bombing raids, reconnaissance flights, tanks and other vehicles, cargo flights and munitions production.

Gaza’s eventual reconstruction must also be included, which makes up a big proportion of the total impact of the war, as Kobayakawa’s Ukraine reconstruction calculations showed. The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has been systematically studying and reporting on “Sustainable debris management in Gaza” as it tracks debris from damaged buildings and infrastructure in Gaza since the outbreak of the conflict in October 2023. Alongside estimating the amounts of debris, UNEP also models different management scenarios – ranging from disposal to recycling – to evaluate the time, resource needs and environmental impacts of each option.

Visa restrictions and the security situation have prevented UNEP staff from entering the Gaza strip to undertake environmental field assessments to date. “While remote sensing can provide a valuable overview of the situation … findings should be verified on the ground for greater accuracy, particularly for designing and implementing remedial interventions,” says a UNEP spokesperson. They add that when it comes to the issue of contamination, UNEP needs “confirmation through field sampling and laboratory analysis” and that UNEP “intends to undertake such field assessments once conditions allow”.

The main risk from hazardous debris – which is likely to make up about 10–20% of the total debris – arises when it is mixed with and contaminates the rest of the debris stock. “This underlines the importance of preventing such mixing and ensuring debris is systematically sorted at source,” adds the UNEP spokesperson.

The ultimate cost

With all these estimates, and adopting a Monte Carlo analysis to account for uncertainties, Neimark and colleagues concluded that, from the first 15 months of the Israel–Gaza conflict, total carbon emissions were 32 million tonnes, which is huge given that the territory has a total area of just 365 km². The number also continues to rise.

Why does this number matter? When lives are being lost in Gaza, Ukraine, and across Sudan, Myanmar and other regions of the world, calculating the environmental and climate cost of war might seem like something only worth bothering about when the fighting stops.

But doing so even while conflicts are taking place can help protect important infrastructure and land, avoid environmentally disastrous events, and to ensure the long rebuild, wherever the conflict may be happening, is informed by science. The UNEP spokesperson says that it is important to “systematically integrate environmental considerations into humanitarian and early recovery planning from the outset” rather than treating the environment as an afterthought. They highlight that governments should “embed it within response plans – particularly in areas where it can directly impact life-saving activities, such as debris clearance and management”.

With Ukraine still in the midst of war, it seems right to leave the final word to Davybida. “Armed conflicts cause profound and often overlooked environmental damage that persists long after the fighting stops,” she says. “Recognizing and monitoring these impacts is vital to guide practical recovery efforts, protect public health, prevent irreversible harm to ecosystems and ensure a sustainable future.”

• The journal Environmental Research Letters has launched a Focus on Initial and Enduring Environmental Consequences of Armed Conflict, which is accepting authors’ expressions of interest until 28 February 2026.

The post The environmental and climate cost of war appeared first on Physics World.

Our blue planet is a Goldilocks world. We’re at just the right distance from the Sun that Earth – like Baby Bear’s porridge – is not too hot or too cold, allowing our planet to be bathed in oceans of liquid water. But further out in our solar system are icy moons that eschew the Goldilocks principle, maintaining oceans and possibly even life far from the Sun.

We call them icy moons because their surface, and part of their interior, is made of solid water-ice. There are over 400 icy moons in the solar system – most are teeny moonlets just a few kilometres across, but a handful are quite sizeable, from hundreds to thousands of kilometres in diameter. Of the big ones, the best known are Jupiter’s moons, Europa, Ganymede and Callisto, and Saturn’s Titan and Enceladus.

Yet these moons are more than just ice. Deep beneath their frozen shells – some –160 to –200 °C cold and bathed in radiation – lie oceans of water, kept liquid thanks to tidal heating as their interiors flex in the strong gravitational grip of their parent planets. With water being a prerequisite for life as we know it, these frigid systems are our best chance for finding life beyond Earth.

The first hints that these icy moons could harbour oceans of liquid water came when NASA’s Voyager 1 and 2 missions flew past Jupiter in 1979. On Europa they saw a broken and geologically youthful-looking surface, just millions of years old, featuring dark cracks that seemed to have slushy material welling up from below. Those hints turned into certainty when NASA’s Galileo mission visited Jupiter between 1995 and 2003. Gravity and magnetometer experiments proved that not only does Europa contain a liquid layer, but so do Ganymede and Callisto.

Meanwhile at Saturn, NASA’s Cassini spacecraft (which arrived in 2004) encountered disturbances in the ringed planet’s magnetic field. They turned out to be caused by plumes of water vapour erupting out of giant fractures splitting the surface of Enceladus, and it is believed that this vapour originates from an ocean beneath the moon’s ice shell. Evidence for an ocean on Titan is a little less certain, but gravity and radio measurements performed by Cassini and its European-built lander Huygens point towards the possibility of some liquid or slushy water beneath the surface.

Water, ice and JUICE

“All of these ocean worlds are going to be different, and we have to go to all of them to understand the whole spectrum of icy moons,” says Amanda Hendrix, director of the Planetary Science Institute in Arizona, US. “Understanding what their oceans are like can tell us about habitability in the solar system and where life can take hold and evolve.”

To that end, an armada of spacecraft will soon be on their way to the icy moons of the outer planets, building on the successes of their predecessors Voyager, Galileo and Cassini–Huygens. Leading the charge is NASA’s Europa Clipper, which is already heading to Jupiter. Clipper will reach its destination in 2030, with the Jupiter Icy moons Explorer (JUICE) from the European Space Agency (ESA) just a year behind it. Europa is the primary target of scientists because it is possibly Jupiter’s most interesting moon as a result of its “astrobiological potential”. That’s the view of Olivier Witasse, who is JUICE project scientist at ESA, and it’s why Europa Clipper will perform nearly 50 fly-bys of the icy moon, some as low as 25 km above the surface. JUICE will also visit Europa twice on its tour of the Jovian system.

The challenge at Europa is that it’s close enough to Jupiter to be deep inside the giant planet’s magnetosphere, which is loaded with high-energy charged particles that bathe the moon’s surface in radiation. That’s why Clipper and JUICE are limited to fly-bys; the radiation dose in orbit around Europa would be too great to linger. Clipper’s looping orbit will take it back out to safety each time. Meanwhile, JUICE will focus more on Callisto and Ganymede – which are both farther out from Jupiter than Europa is – and will eventually go into orbit around Ganymede.

“Ganymede is a super-interesting moon,” says Witasse. For one thing, at 5262 km across it is larger than Mercury, a planet. It also has its own intrinsic magnetic field – one of only three solid bodies in the solar system to do so (the others being Mercury and Earth).

Beneath the icy exterior

It’s the interiors of these moons that are of the most interest to JUICE and Clipper. That’s where the oceans are, hidden beneath many kilometres of ice. While the missions won’t be landing on the Jovian moons, these internal structures aren’t as inaccessible as we might at first think. In fact, there are three independent methods for probing them.

If a moon’s ocean contains salts or other electrically conductive contaminants, interesting things happen when passing through the parent planet’s variable magnetic field. “The liquid is a conductive layer within a varying magnetic field and that induces a magnetic field in the ocean that we can measure with a magnetometer using Faraday’s law,” says Witasse. The amount of salty contaminants, plus the depth of the ocean, influence the magnetometer readings.

Then there’s radio science – the way that an icy moon’s mass bends a radio signal from a spacecraft to Earth. By making multiple fly-bys with different trajectories during different points in a moon’s orbit around its planet, the moon’s gravity field can be measured. Once that is known to exacting detail, it can be applied to models of that moon’s internal structure.

Perhaps the most remarkable method, however, is using a laser altimeter to search for a tidal bulge in the surface of a moon. This is exactly what JUICE will be doing when in orbit around Ganymede. Its laser altimeter will map the shape of the surface – such as hills and crevasses – but gravitational tidal forces from Jupiter are expected to cause a bulge on the surface, deforming it by 1–10 m. How large the bulge is depends upon how deep the ocean is.

“If the surface ice is sitting above a liquid layer then the tide will be much bigger because if you sit on liquid, you are not attached to the rest of the moon,” says Witasse. “Whereas if Ganymede were solid the tide would be quite small because it is difficult to move one big, solid body.”

As for what’s below the oceans, those same gravity and radio-science experiments during previous missions have given us a general idea about the inner structures of Jupiter’s Europa, Ganymede and Callisto. All three have a rocky core. Inside Europa, the ocean surrounds the core, with a ceiling of ice above it. The rock–ocean interface potentially provides a source of chemical energy and nutrients for the ocean and any life there.

Ganymede’s interior structure is more complex. Separating the 3400 km-wide rocky core and the ocean is a layer, or perhaps several layers, of high-pressure ice, and there is another ice layer above the ocean. Without that rock–ocean interface, Ganymede is less interesting from an astrobiological perspective.

Meanwhile, Callisto, being the farthest from Jupiter, receives the least tidal heating of the three. This is reflected in Callisto’s lack of evolution, with its interior having not differentiated into layers as distinct as Europa and Ganymede. “Callisto looks very old,” says Witasse. “We’re seeing it more or less as it was at the beginning of the solar system.”

Crazy cryovolcanism

Tidal forces don’t just keep the interiors of the icy moons warm. They can also drive dramatic activity, such as cryovolcanoes – icy eruptions that spew out gases and volatile materials like liquid water (which quickly freezes in space), ammonia and hydrocarbons. The most obvious example of this is found on Saturn’s Enceladus, where giant water plumes squirt out through “tiger stripe” cracks at the moon’s south pole.

But there’s also growing evidence of cryovolcanism on Europa. In 2012 the Hubble Space Telescope caught sight of what looked like a water plume jetting out 200 km from the moon. But the discovery is controversial despite more data from Hubble and even supporting evidence found in archive data from the Galileo mission. What’s missing is cast-iron proof for Europa’s plumes. That’s where Clipper comes in.

“We need to find out if the plumes are real,” says Hendrix. “What we do know is if there is plume activity happening on Europa then it’s not as consistent or ongoing as is clearly happening at Enceladus.”

At Enceladus, the plumes are driven by tidal forces from Saturn, which squeeze and flex the 500 km-wide moon’s innards, forcing out water from an underground ocean through the tiger stripes. If there are plumes at Europa then they would be produced the same way, and would provide access to material from an ocean that’s dozens of kilometres below the icy crust. “I think we have a lot of evidence that something is happening at Europa,” says Hendrix.

These plumes could therefore be the key to characterizing the hidden oceans. One instrument on Clipper that will play an important role in investigating the plumes at Europa is an ultraviolet spectrometer, a technique that was very useful on the Cassini mission.

Because Enceladus’ plumes were not known until Cassini discovered them, the spacecraft’s instruments had not been designed to study them. However, scientists were able to use the mission’s ultraviolet imaging spectrometer to analyse the vapour when it was between Cassini and the Sun. The resulting absorption lines in the spectrum showed the plumes to be mostly pure water, ejected into space at a rate of 200 kg per second.

The erupted vapour freezes as it reaches space and some of it snows back down onto the surface. Cassini’s ultraviolet spectrometer was again used, this time to detect solar ultraviolet light reflected and scattered off these icy particles in the uppermost layers of Enceladus’ surface. Scientists found that any freshly deposited snow from the plumes has a different chemistry from older surface material that has been weathered and chemically altered by micrometeoroids and radiation, and therefore a different ultraviolet spectrum.

Icy moon landing

Another two instruments that Cassini’s scientists adapted to study the plumes were the cosmic dust analyser, and the ion and neutral mass spectrometer. When Cassini flew through the fresh plumes and Saturn’s E-ring, which is formed from older plume ejections, it could “taste” the material by sampling it directly. Recent findings from this data indicate that the plumes are rich in salt as well as organic molecules, including aliphatic and cyclic esters and ethers (carbon-bonded acid-based compounds such as fatty acids) (Nature Astron. 9 1662). Scientists also found nitrogen- and oxygen-bearing compounds that play a role in basic biochemistry and which could therefore potentially be building blocks of prebiotic molecules or even life in Enceladus’ ocean.

While Cassini could only observe Enceladus’ plumes and fresh snow from orbit, astronomers are planning a lander that could let them directly inspect the surface snow. Currently in the technology development phase, it would be launched by ESA sometime in the 2040s to arrive at the moon in 2054, when winter at Enceladus’ southern, tiger stripe-adorned pole turns to spring and daylight returns.

“What makes the mission so exciting to me is that although it looks like every large icy moon has an ocean, Enceladus is one where there is a very high chance of actually sampling ocean water,” says Jörn Helbert, head of the solar system section at ESA, and the science lead on the prospective mission.

The planned spacecraft will fly through the plumes with more sophisticated instruments than Cassini’s, designed specifically to sample the vapour (like Clipper will do at Europa). Yet adding a lander could get us even closer to the plume material. By landing close to the edge of a tiger stripe, a lander would dramatically increase the mission’s ability to analyse the material from the ocean in the form of fresh snow. In particular, it would look for biosignatures – evidence of the ocean being habitable, or perhaps even inhabited by microbes.

However, new research urges caution in drawing hasty conclusions about organic molecules present in the plumes and snow. While not as powerful as Jupiter’s, Saturn also has a magnetosphere filled with high-energy ions that bombard Enceladus. A recent laboratory study, led by Grace Richards of the Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziale (IAPS-INAF) in Rome, found that when these ions hit surface-ice they trigger chemical reactions that produce organic molecules, including some that are precursors to amino acids, similar to what Cassini tasted in the plumes.

So how can we be sure that the organics in Enceladus’ plumes originate from the ocean, and not from radiation-driven chemistry on the surface? It is the same quandary for dark patches around cracks on the surface of Europa, which seem to be rich with organic molecules that could either originate via upwelling from the ocean below, or just from radiation triggering organic chemistry. A lander on Enceladus might solve not just the mystery of that particular moon, but provide important pointers to explain what we’re seeing on Europa too.

More icy companions

Enceladus is not Saturn’s only icy moon; there’s Titan too. As the ringed planet’s largest moon at 5150 km across, Titan (like Ganymede) is larger than Mercury. However, unlike the other moons in the solar system, Titan has a thick atmosphere rich in nitrogen and methane. The atmosphere is opaque, hiding the surface from spacecraft in orbit except at infrared wavelengths and radar, which means that getting below the smoggy atmosphere is a must.

ESA did this in 2005 with the Huygens lander, which, as it parachuted down to Titan’s frozen surface, revealed it to be a land of hills and dune plains with river channels, lakes and seas of flowing liquid hydrocarbons. These organic molecules originate from the methane in its atmosphere reacting with solar ultraviolet.

Until recently, it was thought that Titan has a core of rock, surrounded by a shell of high-pressure ice, above which sits a layer of salty liquid water and then an outer crust of water ice. However, new evidence from re-analysing Cassini’s data suggests that rather than oceans of liquid water, Titan has “slush” below the frozen exterior, with pockets of liquid water (Nature 648 556). The team, led by Flavio Petricca from NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, looked at how Titan’s shape morphs as it orbits Saturn. There is a several-hour lag between the moon passing the peak of Saturn’s gravitational pull and its shape shifting, implying that while there must be some form of non-solid substance below Titan’s surface to allow for deformation, more energy is lost or dissipated than would be if it was liquid water. Instead, the researchers found that a layer of high-pressure ice close to its melting point – or slush – better fits the data.

To find out more about Titan, NASA is planning to follow in Huygens’ footsteps with the Dragonfly mission but in an excitingly different way. Set to launch in 2028, Dragonfly should arrive at Titan in 2034 where it will deploy a rotorcraft that will fly over the moon’s surface, beneath the smog, occasionally touching down to take readings. Scientists are intending to use Dragonfly to sample surface material with a mass spectrometer to identify organic compounds and therefore better assess Titan’s biological potential. It will also perform atmospheric and geological measurements, even listening for seismic tremors while landed, which could provide further clues about Titan’s interior.

Jupiter and Saturn are also not the only planets to possess icy moons. We find them around Uranus and Neptune too. Even the dwarf planet Pluto and its largest moon Charon have strong similarities to icy moons. Whether any of these bodies, so far out from the Sun, can maintain an ocean is unclear, however.

Recent findings point to an ocean deep inside Uranus’ moon Ariel that may once have been 170 km deep, kept warm by tidal heating (Icarus 444 116822). But over time Ariel’s orbit around Uranus has become increasingly circular, weakening the tidal forces acting on it, and the ocean has partly frozen. Another of Uranus’ moons, Miranda, has a chaotic surface that appears to have melted and refrozen, and the pattern of cracks on its surface strongly suggests that the moon also contains an ocean, or at least did 150 million years ago. A new mission to Uranus is a top priority in the US’s most recent Decadal Review.

It’s becoming clear that icy ocean moons could far outnumber more traditional habitable planets like Earth, not just in our solar system, but across the galaxy (although none have been confirmed yet). Understanding the internal structures of the icy moons in our solar system, and characterizing their oceans, is vital if we are to expand the search for life beyond Earth.

The post Exploring the icy moons of the solar system appeared first on Physics World.

How well have you been following events in physics? There are 20 questions in total: blue is your current question and white means unanswered, with green and red being right and wrong.

16–20 Top quark – congratulations, you’ve hit Einstein level

11–15 Strong force – good but not quite Nobel standard

6–10 Weak force – better interaction needed

0–5 Bottom quark – not even wrong

The post Check your physics knowledge with our bumper end-of-year quiz appeared first on Physics World.

ZAP-X is a next-generation, cobalt-free, vault-free stereotactic radiosurgery system purpose-built for the brain. Delivering highly precise, non-invasive treatments with exceptionally low whole-brain and whole-body dose, ZAP-X’s gyroscopic beam delivery, refined beam geometry and fully integrated workflow enable state-of-the-art SRS without the burdens of radioactive sources or traditional radiation bunkers.

Theresa Hofman is deputy head of medical physics at the European Radiosurgery Center Munich (ERCM), specializing in stereotactic radiosurgery with the CyberKnife and ZAP‑X systems. She has been part of the ERCM team since 2018 and has extensive clinical experience with ZAP‑X, one of the first centres worldwide to implement the technology in 2021. Since then, the team has treated more than 900 patients with ZAP‑X, and she is deeply involved in both clinical use and evaluation of its planning software.

She holds a master’s degree in physics from Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, where she authored two first‑author publications on range verification in carbon‑ion therapy. At ERCM, she has published additional first‑author studies on CyberKnife kidney‑treatment accuracy and on comparative planning between ZAP‑X and CyberKnife. She is currently conducting further research on the latest ZAP‑X planning software. Her work is driven by the goal of advancing high‑quality radiosurgery and ensuring the best possible treatment for every patient.

The post ZAP-X radiosurgery and ZAP-Axon SRS planning: technology overview, workflow and complex case insights from a leading SRS centre appeared first on Physics World.

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) provides valuable insights into the physical processes within batteries – but how can these measurements directly inform physics-based models? In this webinar, we present recent work showing how impedance data can be used to extract grouped parameters for physics-based models such as the Doyle–Fuller–Newman (DFN) model or the reduced-order single-particle model with electrolyte (SPMe).

We will introduce PyBaMM (Python Battery Mathematical Modelling), an open-source framework for flexible and efficient battery simulation, and show how our extension, PyBaMM-EIS, enables fast numerical impedance computation for any implemented model at any operating point. We also demonstrate how PyBOP, another open-source tool, performs automated parameter fitting of models using measured impedance data across multiple states of charge.

Battery modelling is challenging, and obtaining accurate fits can be difficult. Our technique offers a flexible way to update model equations and parameterize models using impedance data.

Join us to see how our tools create a smooth path from measurement to model to simulation.

An interactive Q&A session follows the presentation.

Noël Hallemans is a postdoctoral research assistant in engineering science at the University of Oxford, where he previously lectured in mathematics at St Hugh’s College. He earned his PhD in 2023 from the Vrije Universiteit Brussel and the University of Warwick, focusing on frequency-domain, data-driven modelling of electrochemical systems.

His research at the Battery Intelligence Lab, led by Professor David Howey, integrates electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) with physics-based modelling to improve understanding and prediction of battery behaviour. He also develops multisine EIS techniques for battery characterisation during operation (for example, charging or relaxation).

 

The post Physics-based battery model parameterization from impedance data appeared first on Physics World.

A new measurement by CERN’s ATLAS Collaboration has strengthened evidence that the masses of fundamental particles originate through their interaction with the Higgs field. Building on earlier results from CERN’s CMS Collaboration, the observations suggest that muon–antimuon pairs (dimuons) can be created by the decay of Higgs bosons.

In the Standard Model of particle physics, the fermionic particles are organized into three different generations, broadly in terms of their masses. The first generation comprises the two lightest quarks (up and down), the lightest lepton (the electron) and the electron neutrino. The second includes the strange and charm quarks, the muon and its neutrino; and the third generation the bottom and top quarks, the tau and its neutrino. In terms of the charged fermions, the top quark is nearly 340,000 times heavier than the lightest – the electron.

All of the quarks and leptons have both right- and left-handed components, which relate to the direction of a particle’s spin relative to its direction of motion (right-handed if both directions are aligned; left-handed if they are anti-aligned).

Right- and left-handed particles are treated the same by the strong and electromagnetic forces, regardless of their generation in the Standard Model. The weak force, however, only acts on left-handed particles.

Flipping handedness

In the 1960s, Steven Weinberg uncovered a theoretical solution to this seemingly bizarre asymmetry. He proposed that the Higgs field acts as a bridge between each particle’s left- and right-handed components, in a way that respects the Standard Model’s underlying symmetry. This interaction causes the particle to constantly flip between its two components, creating a resistance to motion that can be perceived as mass.

However, this deepens the mystery. According to Weinberg’s theory, higher-mass particles must interact more strongly with this Higgs field – but in contrast, the strong and electromagnetic forces can only differentiate between these particles according to their charges (colour and electrical). The question is how does Higgs field can distinguish between particles in different generations if their charges are identical?

Key to solving this mystery will be to observe the decay products of Higgs bosons with different interaction strengths. For stronger interactions, corresponding to heavier generations, these decays should become far more likely.

In 2022, both the ATLAS and CMS collaborations did just this. Through proton–proton collision experiments at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the groups independently observed Higgs bosons decaying to tau–antitau pairs. This relatively common process occurred at the same rate as predicted by theory.

Rare decay

A year earlier, similar experiments by the CMS collaboration probed the second generation by observing muon–antimuon pairs from the decays of Higgs bosons. This rarer event occurs in just 1 in 5000 Higgs decays.

In their latest study, the ATLAS collaboration have now reproduced this CMS result independently. They collided protons at about 13 TeV and observed muon–antimuon pairs in the same range of energies predicted by theory.

Through the improvements they offer on the earlier CMS analysis, these new results bring dimuon observations to a statistical significance of 3.4σ. This is well below the 5σ standard required for the observation to be considered a discovery, so more work is needed.

The research could also provide guidance in the search for much rarer Higgs interactions that involve first-generation particles. This includes decay electron–positron pairs, originating from Higgs bosons which decay in just 1 in 200 million cases.

The research is described in Physical Review Letters.

The post Higgs decay to muon–antimuon pairs sheds light on the origin of mass appeared first on Physics World.

Russia wants to revive a Soviet-era particle accelerator that has been abandoned since the 1990s. The Kurchatov Institute for High Energy Physics has allocated 176 million rubles ($25m) to assess the current condition of the unfinished 600 GeV Proton Accelerator and Storage Complex (UNK) in Protvino near Moscow. The move is part of plans to strengthen Russia’s technological sovereignty and its activity in high-energy physics.

Although work on the UNK was officially halted in the 1990s, construction only ceased in 2013. At that time, a 21 km tunnel had been built at a depth of 60 m along with underground experimental hall lighting and ventilation systems.

In February 2025, physicist Mikhail Kovalchuk, president of the Kurchatov Institute National Research Center, noted in Russia’s Kommersant newspaper that enormous intellectual and material resources had been invested in the UNK’s design and development before it was cancelled.

According to Kovalchuk, Western sanctions provided an additional impetus to restore the project, as scientists that had previously worked in CERN projects could no longer do so.

“By participating in [CERN] projects, we not only preserved our scientific potential and survived a difficult period, but also enriched ourselves intellectually and technologically,” added Kovalchuk. “Today we are self-sufficient.”

Anatoli Romaniouk, a Russian particle physicist who has worked at CERN since 1990, told Physics World that a revival of the UNK will at least maintain fundamental physics research in Russia.

“If this project is realized, then there is hope that it will be possible to at least somewhat slow down the scientific lag of Russian physics with global science,” says Romaniouk.

While official plans for the accelerator have not been disclosed, it is thought that the proton beam energy could be upgraded to reach 3 TeV. Romaniouk says it is also unclear what kind of science will be done with the accelerator, which will depend on what ideas come forward.

Yet some Russian scientists say that it could be used to produce neutrinos. This would involve putting a neutrino detector nearby to characterize the beam before it is sent some 4000 km towards Lake Baikal where a neutrino detector – the Baikal Deep Underwater Neutrino Telescope – is already installed 1 km underground.

“I think it’s possible to find an area of ​​high-energy physics where the research with the help of this collider could be beneficial,” adds Romaniouk.

The post Russia plans to revive abandoned Soviet-era particle accelerator appeared first on Physics World.

Ever since the National Quantum Computing Centre was launched five years ago, its core mission has been to accelerate the pathway towards practical adoption of the technology. That has required technical innovation to scale up hardware platforms and create the software tools and algorithms needed to tackle real-world applications, but there has also been a strong focus on engaging with companies to build connections, provide access to quantum resources, and identify opportunities for deriving near-term value from quantum computing.

It makes sense, then, that the NQCC should form the cornerstone of a new Quantum Cluster at the Harwell Campus of Science and Innovation in Oxfordshire. The hope is that the NQCC’s technical expertise and infrastructure, combined with the services and facilities available on the wider Harwell Campus, will provide a magnet for new quantum start-ups as well as overseas companies that are seeking to establish a presence within the UK’s quantum ecosystem.

By accelerating collaboration across government, industry and academia, we will turn research excellence into industrial strength.

“We want to leverage the public investment that has been made into the NQCC to catalyse business growth and attract more investment into the UK’s quantum sector,” said Najwa Sidqi, manager of the Harwell Quantum Cluster, at the official launch event in November. “By accelerating collaboration across government, industry and academia, we will turn research excellence into industrial strength.”

The cluster, which has been ramping up its activities over the last year, is working to ambitious targets. Over the next decade the aim is to incubate at least 100 quantum companies on the Harwell site, create more than 1000 skilled jobs, and generate more than £1 billion of private and public investment. “Our aim is to build the foundations of a globally competitive quantum economy that delivers impact far beyond science and research,” added Sidqi.

Tangible evidence that the approach works is offered by the previous clustering activities on the Harwell Campus, notably the Space Cluster that has expanded rapidly since its launch in 2010. Anchored by the RAL Space national laboratory and bolstered by the presence of ESA and the UK Space Agency, the Space Cluster now comprises more than 100 organizations that range from small start-ups to the UK technology hubs of global heavyweights such as Airbus and Lockheed Martin.

More generally, the survival rate of start-up companies operating on the Harwell site is around 95%, compared with an average of around 50%. “At Harwell there is a high density of innovators sharing the same space, which generates more connections and more ideas,” said Julia Sutcliffe, Chief Scientific Advisor for the UK’s Department for Business and Trade. “It provides an incredible combination of world-class infrastructure and expertise, accelerating the innovation pathway and helping to create a low-risk environment for early-stage businesses and investors.”

The NQCC has already seeded that innovation activity through its early engagement with both quantum companies and end users of the technology. One major initiative has been the testbed programme, which has enabled the NQCC to invest £30m in seven hardware companies to deploy prototype quantum computers on the Harwell Campus. As well as providing access to operational systems based on all of the leading qubit modalities, the testbed programme has also provided an impetus for inward investment and job creation.

One clear example is provided by QuEra Computing, a US-based spin-off from Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology that is developing a hardware platform based on neutral atoms. QuEra was one of the companies to win funding through the testbed programme, with the firm setting up a UK-based team to deploy its prototype system on the Harwell Campus. But the company could soon see the benefits of establishing a UK centre for technology development on the site. “Harwell is immensely helpful to us,” said Ed Durking, Corporate Director of QuEra Computing UK. “It’s a nucleus where we enjoy access to world-class talent, vendors, customers, and suppliers.”

On a practical level, establishing its UK headquarters on the Harwell Campus has provided QueEra with easy access to specialist contractors and services for fitting out and its laboratories. In June the company moved into a building that is fully equipped with flexible lab space for R&D and manufacturing, and since then the UK-based team has started to build the company’s most powerful quantum computer at the facility. Longer term, establishing a base within the UK could open the door to new collaborations and funding opportunities for QuEra to further develop its technology, with the company now focused on integrating full error correction into its neutral-atom platform by 2026.

Access to the world-class infrastructure on the Harwell Campus has benefitted the other testbed providers in different ways. For ORCA Computing, a UK company developing and manufacturing photonic quantum computers, the goal was to install a testbed system within Harwell’s high-performance computing centre rather than the NQCC’s experimental labs. “Our focus is to build commercial photonic quantum systems that can be integrated into conventional datacentres, enabling hybrid quantum-classical workflows for real-world applications,” explained Geoff Barnes, Head of Customer Success at ORCA. “Having the NQCC as an expert customer enabled us to demonstrate and validate our capabilities, building the system in our own facility and then deploying it within an operational environment.”

This process provided a valuable learning experience for the ORCA engineers. The experts at Harwell helped them to navigate the constraints of installing equipment within a live datacentre, while also providing practical assistance with the networking infrastructure. Now that the system is up and running, the Harwell site also provides ORCA with an open environment for showcasing its technology to prospective customers. “As well as delivering a testbed system to the NQCC, we can now demonstrate our platform to clients within a real-world setting,” added Barnes. “It has also been a critical step toward commercial deployment on our roadmap, enabling our partners to access our systems remotely for applications development.”

While the NQCC has already played a vital role in supporting companies as they make the transition towards commercialization, the Quantum Cluster has a wider remit to extend those efforts into other quantum technologies, such as sensing and communications, that are already finding real-world applications. It will also have a more specific focus on attracting new investment into the UK, and supporting the growth of companies that are transitioning from the start-up phase to establish larger scale commercial operations.

“In the UK we have traditionally been successful in creating spin-off activities from our strong research base, but it has been more challenging to generate the large capital investments needed to scale businesses in the technology sector,” commented Sidqi. “We want to strengthen that pipeline to ensure that the UK can translate its leadership in quantum research and early-stage innovation into long-term prosperity.”

To accelerate that process the Quantum Cluster announced a strategic partnership with Quantum Exponential, the first UK-based venture capital fund to be entirely focused on quantum technologies. Ian Pearson, the non-executive chairman of the Quantum Exponential, explained that the company is working to generate an investment fund of £100m by the end of 2027 that will support quantum companies as they commercialize their technologies and scale up their businesses. “Now is the time for investment into quantum sector,” said Pearson. “A specialist quantum fund with the expertise needed to analyse and price deals, and to do all the necessary due diligence, will attract more private investment that will help UK companies to grow and scale.”

Around two-thirds of the investments will be directed towards UK-based companies, and as part of the partnership Quantum Exponential will work with the Quantum Cluster to identify and support high-potential quantum businesses within the Harwell Campus. The Quantum Cluster will also play a crucial role in boosting investor confidence – particularly in the unique ability of the Harwell Campus to nurture successful technology businesses – and making connections with international innovation networks to provide UK-based companies with improved access to global markets.

“This new cluster strengthens our national capability and sends a clear signal to global investors that the UK is the place to develop and scale quantum technologies,” commented Michael Cuthbert, Director of the NQCC. “It will help to ensure that quantum innovation delivers benefits not just for science and industry, but for the economy and society as a whole.”

The post Quantum cluster targets business growth appeared first on Physics World.

An aerogel material that is more than 99% transparent to light and is an excellent thermal insulator has been developed by Ivan Smalyukh and colleagues at the University of Colorado Boulder in the US. Called MOCHI, the material can be manufactured in large slabs and could herald a major advance in energy-efficient windows.

While the insulating properties of building materials have steadily improved over the past decades, windows have consistently lagged behind. The problem is that current materials used in windows – mostly glass – have an inherent trade-off between insulating ability and optical transparency. This is addressed to some extent by using two or three layers of glass in double- and triple-glazed windows. However, windows remain the largest source of heat loss from most buildings.

A solution to the window problem could lie with aerogels in which the liquid component of a regular gel is replaced with air. This creates solid materials with networks of pores that make aerogels the lightest solid materials ever produced. If the solid component is a poor conductor of heat, then the aerogel will be an extremely good thermal insulator.

“Conventional aerogels, like the silica and cellulose based ones, are common candidates for transparent, thermally insulating materials,” Smalyukh explains. “However, their visible-range optical transparency is intrinsically limited by the scattering induced by their polydisperse pores – which can range from nanometres to micrometres in scale.”

Hazy appearance

While this problem can be overcome fairly easily in thin aerogel films, creating appropriately-sized pores on the scale of practical windows has so far proven much more difficult, leading to a hazy, translucent appearance.

Now, Smalyukh’s team has developed a new fabrication technique involving a removable template. Their approach hinges on the tendency of surfactant molecules called CPCL to self-assemble in water. Under carefully controlled conditions, the molecules spontaneously form networks of cylindrical tubes, called micelles. Once assembled, the aerogel precursor – a silicone material called polysiloxane – condenses around the micelles, freezing their structure in place.

“The ensuing networks of micelle-templated polysiloxane tubes could be then preserved upon the removal of surfactant, and replacing the fluid solvent with air,” Smalyukh describes. The end result was a consistent mesoporous structure, with pores ranging from 2–50 nm in diameter. This is too small to scatter visible light, but large enough to interfere with heat transport.

As a result, the mesoporous, optically clear heat insulator (MOCHI) maintains its transparency even when fabricated in slabs over 3 cm thick and a square metre in area. This suggests that it could be used to create practical windows.

High thermal performance

“We demonstrated thermal conductivity lower than that of still air, as well as an average light transmission above 99%,” Smalyukh says. “Therefore, MOCHI glass units can provide a similar rate of heat transfer to high-performing building roofs and walls, with thicknesses comparable to double pane windows.”

If rolled out on commercial scales, this could lead to entirely new ways to manage interior heating and cooling. According to the team’s calculations, a building retrofitted with MOCHI windows could boost its energy efficiency from around 6% (a typical value in current buildings) to over 30%, while reducing the heat energy passing through by around 50%.

With its ability to admit light while blocking heat transport, the researchers suggest that MOCHI could unlock entirely new functionalities for conventional windows. “Such transparent insulation also allows for efficient harnessing of thermal energy from unconcentrated solar radiation in different climate zones, promising the use of parts of opaque building envelopes as solar thermal energy generating panels,” Smalyukh adds.

The new material is described in Science.

The post Transparent and insulating aerogel could boost energy efficiency of windows appeared first on Physics World.