ConnexionThe obscure physics theory that helped Chinese science emerge from the shadows
“The Straton Model of elementary particles had very limited influence in the West,” said Jinyan Liu as she sat with me in a quiet corner of the CERN cafeteria. Liu, who I caught up with during a break in a recent conference on the history of particle physics, was referring to a particular model of elementary particle physics first put together in China in the mid-1960s. The Straton Model was, and still largely is, unknown outside that country. “But it was an essential step forward,” Liu added, “for Chinese physicists in joining the international community.”
Liu was at CERN to give a talk on how Chinese theorists redirected their research efforts in the years after the Cultural Revolution, which ended in 1976. They switched from the Straton Model, which was a politically infused theory of matter favoured by Mao Zedong, the founder of the People’s Republic of China, to mainstream particle physics as practised by the rest of the world. It’s easy to portray the move as the long-overdue moment when Chinese scientists resumed their “real” physics research. But, Liu told me, “actually it was much more complicated”.
A physicist by training, Liu received her PhD on contemporary theories of spontaneous charge-parity (CP) violation from the Institute of Theoretical Physics at the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) in 2013. She then switched to the CAS Institute for History of Natural Sciences, where she was its first member with a physics PhD. Her initial research topic was the history and development of the Straton Model.
The model is essentially a theory of the structure of hadrons – either baryons (such as protons and neutrons) or mesons (such as pions and kaons). But the model’s origins are as improbable as they are labyrinthine. Mao, who had a keen interest in natural science, was convinced that matter was infinitely divisible, and in 1963 he came across an article by the Marxist-inspired Japanese physicist Shoichi Sakata (1911–1970).
First published in Japanese in 1961 and later translated into Russian, Sakata’s paper was entitled “Dialogues concerning a new view of elementary particles”. It restated Sakata’s belief, which he had been working on since the 1950s, that hadrons are made of smaller constituents – “elementary particles are not the ultimate elements of matter” as he put it. With some Chinese scholars back then still paying close attention to publications from the Soviet Union, their former political and ideological ally, that paper was then translated into Chinese.
Mao Zedong was engrossed in Shoichi Sakata’s paper, for it seemed to offer scientific support for his own views.
This version appeared in the Bulletin of the Studies of Dialectics of Nature in 1963. Mao, who received an issue of that bulletin from his son-in-law, was engrossed in Sakata’s paper, for it seemed to offer scientific support for his own views. Sakata’s article – both in the original Japanese and now in Chinese – cited Friedrich Engels’ view that matter has numerous stages of discrete but qualitatively different parts. In addition, it quoted Lenin’s remark that “even the electron is inexhaustible”.
A wider dimension
“International politics now also entered,” Liu told me, as we discussed the issue further at CERN. A split between China and the Soviet Union had begun to open up in the late 1950s, with Mao breaking off relations with the Soviet Union and starting to establish non-governmental science and technology exchanges between China and Japan. Indeed, when China hosted the Peking Symposium of foreign scientists in 1964, Japan brought the biggest delegation, with Sakata as its leader.
At the event, Mao personally congratulated Sakata on his theory. It was, Sakata later recalled, “the most unforgettable moment of my journey to China”. In 1965, Sakata’s paper was retranslated from the Japanese original, with an annotated version published in Red Flag and the newspaper Renmin ribao, or “People’s Daily”, both official organs of the Chinese Communist Party.
Chinese physicists realized that they could capitalize on Mao’s enthusiasm to make elementary particle physics a legitimate research direction.
Chinese physicists, who had been assigned to work on the atomic bomb and other research deemed important by the Communist Party, now started to take note. Uninterested in philosophy, they realized that they could capitalize on Mao’s enthusiasm to make elementary particle physics a legitimate research direction.
As a result, 39 members of CAS, Peking University and the University of Science and Technology of China formed the Beijing Elementary Particle Group. Between 1965 and 1966, they wrote dozens of papers on a model of hadrons inspired by both Sakata’s work and quark theory based on the available experimental data. It was dubbed the Straton Model because it involved layers or “strata” of particles nested in each other.
Liu has interviewed most surviving members of the group and studied details of the model. It differed from the model being developed at the time by the US theorist Murray Gell-Mann, which saw quarks as not physical but mathematical elements. As Liu discovered, Chinese particle physicists were now given resources they’d never had before. In particular, they could use computers, which until then had been devoted to urgent national defence work. “To be honest,” Liu chuckled, “the elementary particle physicists didn’t use computers much, but at least they were made available.”
The high-water mark for the Straton Model occurred in July 1966 when members of the Beijing Elementary Particle Group presented it at a summer physics colloquium organized by the China Association for Science and Technology. The opening ceremony was held in Tiananmen Square, in what was then China’s biggest conference centre, with attendees including Abdus Salam from Imperial College London. The only high-profile figure to be invited from the West, Salam was deemed acceptable because he was science advisor to the president of Pakistan, a country considered outside the western orbit.
The proceedings of the colloquium were later published as “Research on the theory of elementary particles carried out under the brilliant illumination of Mao Tse-Tung’s thought”. Its introduction was what Liu calls a “militant document” – designed to reinforce the idea that the authors were carrying Mao’s thought into scientific research to repudiate “decadent feudal, bourgeois and revisionist ideologies”.
Participants in Beijing had expected to make their advances known internationally by publishing the proceedings in English. But the Cultural Revolution had just begun two months before, and publications in English were forbidden. “As a result,” Liu told me, “the model had very limited influence outside China.” Sakata, however, had an important influence on Japanese theorists having co-authored the key paper on neutrino flavour oscillation (Prog. Theoretical. Physics 28 870).
A resurfaced effort
In recent years, Liu has shed new light on the Straton Model, writing a paper in the journal Chinese Annals of History of Science and Technology (2 85). In 2022, she also published a 2022 Chinese-language book entitled Constructing a Theory of Hadron Structure: Chinese Physicists’ Straton Model, which describes the downfall of the model after 1966. None of its predicted material particles appeared, though a candidate event once occurred in a cosmic ray observatory in the south of China.
By 1976, quantum chromodynamics (QCD) had convincingly emerged as the established model of hadrons. The effective end of the Straton Model took place at a conference in January 1980 in Conghua, near Hong Kong. Hung-Yuan Tzu, one of the key leaders of the Beijing Group, gave a paper entitled “Reminiscences of the Straton Model”, signalling that physics had moved on.
During our meeting at CERN, Liu showed me photos of the 1980 event. “It was a very important conference in the history of Chinese physics,” she said, “the first opening to Chinese physicists in the West”. Visits by Chinese expatriates were organized by Tsung-Dao Lee and Chen-Ning Yang, who shared the 1957 Nobel Prize for Physics for their work on parity violation.
The critical point
It is easy for westerners to mock the Straton Model; Sheldon Glashow once referred to it as about “Maons”. But Liu sees it as significant research that had many unexpected consequences, such as helping to advance physics research in China. “It gave physicists a way to pursue quantum field theory without having to do national defence work”.
The model also trained young researchers in particle physics and honed their research competence. After the post-Cultural Revolution reform and its opening to the West, these physicists could then integrate into the international community. “The story,” Liu said, “shows how ingeniously the Chinese physicists adapted to the political situation.”
The post The obscure physics theory that helped Chinese science emerge from the shadows appeared first on Physics World.
