↩ Accueil

Vue lecture

Pluribus Episode 5 Review - What’s Under There!?

Full spoilers follow for Pluribus Episode 5, “Got Milk,” which is available now on Apple TV.

Man, the whole planet is pissed off at Carol this week, that’s for sure.

That includes her fellow un-infected, Laxmi (Menik Gooneratne), who calls her from across the world to rip Rhea Seehorn’s Carol a new one for making her son cry. I mean, she made the entire human race cry, save 13 people, but Laxmi is mostly upset about her son.

It’s fun that Laxmi and Carol can’t find common ground no matter what, despite the dramatic shift in human history that took place eight days ago. But what’s most interesting in this episode is how the Joined are all giving Carol the cold shoulder. Like I said last week, it’s hard not to feel bad for what Carol did to Zosia (Karolina Wydra), sending her into cardiac arrest after drugging her and all. And even though we’re talking, again, about an incredible alien-influenced event that has dramatically changed humankind, it’s hard not to see where the Joined are coming from on this one. They just don’t feel like they can be around Carol anymore.

Which means that Pluribus Episode 5 puts Carol in a very The Last Woman on Earth place. We may have seen how Manousos (Carlos-Manuel Vesga) was living his best The Omega Man life last week (or actually his worst life, eating garbage and whatnot), but now Carol is truly getting a chance to have an entire city (and its surrounding area) to herself. It’s maybe not as great as she thought it might be? The mass purge event of Albuquerque, with a church-like choir playing on the soundtrack as everyone loads up in cars, buses, etc. to leave the city, certainly sells the “group” in group-think aspect of the Joined. Hey, they just need a little space!

Seehorn continues to keep the laughs coming – albeit the darkly fatalistic laughs – as Carol tries to navigate this new iteration of the post-Joined world. Her video message to the other 12 non-infected is great as she does her best to convince them that they need to band together not just for their sake, but also for all of humanity. Amusingly, she can’t help but lecture them all, no matter how cheery and optimistic she tries to be, and the stilted sign off of “Good luck and godspeed!”, followed by an awkward clearing of her throat, is just perfect. (It’s a little less fun/more sad later when she deletes the video with her scientific, I guess, finds, as the loneliness and desperation of her current situation really start to kick in.)

Of course, the big question coming out of “Got Milk” is what’s really up with the milk of the title?

“Got Milk” has other moments of humor, like the drone – first glimpsed in the initial and puzzling teaser trailer for the show this past fall – that can’t quite handle the weight of all that garbage, and winds up as the neighborhood’s newest ornament wrapped around a street lamp pole. But it’s also pretty intense at times, particularly when those wolves start staking out Carol’s house. It actually makes sense that they would, since the Joined seem pretty organized and surely would have cleared the area of most of the garbage and food stuffs that the wolves would be attracted to. That means Carol is the only game in town, but it also means that Helen’s fresh grave is open game.

It’s pretty intense when Carol sees the wolves digging at the grave, and when that one wolf snarls at her it’s suddenly driven home how alone Carol is at this point. But Charlton Heston would be proud of her response. Sure, she couldn’t figure out how to get the shotgun out of its holder (turns out you press a button), but her quick wits prevented a potentially horrific (and messy) situation. Seehorn sells it too after she’s smashed through the fence with her cop car and sits parked over the gravesite, just panting before eventually falling asleep during her all-night vigil.

Of course, the big question coming out of “Got Milk” is what’s really up with the milk of the title, the stuff that definitely isn’t milk and which the Joined are so into? Carol may not be great at science, but she’s done a pretty good job on the sleuthing front in terms of following the trail of the milk’s production pipeline – and all without Google Maps apparently! Her gasp which ends the episode, delayed for a beat as she takes in the scope of whatever it is she found under that tarp, is extremely effective.

What did she find!? Tune in next week…

Questions and Notes From Kepler-22b

  • So they’ve got kids working jobs too, like that one who’s pushing a cart around in the hospital? I guess that clocks. They don’t need to go to school anymore, after all. (Even better: It’s a medication cart he’s pushing around. Because there’s no worry that he might accidentally or intentionally take drugs that aren’t meant for him.)
  • The constant back and forth with the Joined’s voicemail system might seem kind of familiar to anyone who has tried to make a doctors appointment or deal with customer service one way or another these days, though the Joined are at least way more efficient.
  • I wonder if the Joined were worried about Carol during the whole wolves incident. Actually, are they still watching her with satellites?
  • Even though Apple provided press screeners for the first seven episodes, I’ve been watching them one at a time so I don’t get too far ahead for these reviews. So I have no idea what’s under that tarp, but my gut tells me it’s gonna be a Soylent Green is people situation, eh? If so, then Charlton Heston’s legacy really is all over this show!

  •  

Pluribus Episode 4 Review - ‘Please, Carol’

Full spoilers follow for Pluribus Episode 4, “Please, Carol,” which is available now on Apple TV.

And so enters Manousos Oviedo!

We’ve heard about the gentleman from Paraguay before, this manager of a storage facility, the outlier among the non-infected who wants nothing to do with the Joined. And we also literally heard him last week, when he wound up in a shouting match on the phone with Rhea Seehorn’s Carol.

But now Pluribus’ fourth episode kicks off with another jaunt across the globe as we meet the character in person. Played by Carlos-Manuel Vesga, Manousos has approached this whole psychic-glue situation in a much more old-school, Charlton-Heston-in-The-Omega-Man way than the rest of those who have been unaffected by the virus. Holed up in his storage facility office, with the windows covered over as he methodically checks each radio frequency on his ham radio for any signs of, presumably, normal human existence, Manousos is even more suspicious of the Joined than Carol is.

He’s also going to starve to death if he doesn’t figure out a better plan. Those sweetener packets and coffee creamers aren’t going to last forever, let alone the dog food, but fortunately this mini-flashback to his conversation with Carol shows that he now has a ray of hope. (It’s also a lot of fun to actually see some of their chat translated this time around.) Yeah, Manousos and Carol are going to hit it off famously… eventually.

Back in Albuquerque, Carol takes to driving a police car – because it was there, because why not? – as she heads home from the hospital where Zosia (Karolina Wydra) is recovering from that unfortunate hand grenade business from last episode. Upon arriving at her house, she finds a whole crew repairing the damage from that incident, including the mayor and the best guest player of the week, Somebody Somewhere's Jeff Hiller, who plays Larry, aka Shorty.

Manousos has approached this whole psychic-glue situation in a much more old-school, Charlton-Heston-in-The-Omega-Man way.

Larry/Shorty had many friends before the Joining! And it’s no surprise, because when Carol uses him for a bit of an experiment in determining the Joined’s ability to lie, or not as the case may be, he’s just so nice and sweet and lovable. Carol’s books are as wonderful as Shaksespeare, he says! It’s not a lie, because a small but not insignificant portion of the population actually believes that. But when asked what Helen thought of Carol’s work… well, there’s no getting around that either. Her unpublished novel, Bitter Chrysalis? It was “fine,” Helen thought. Of course, she only got to page 137, paragraph three of it anyway.

Putting aside how the Joined continue to mess with the memory of Helen and, frankly, what should still be a period of mourning for Carol, this entire interlude does prove that they can’t lie. And later in the episode, this discovery leads to Carol messing up poor Zosia even worse than she did last week with the hand grenade. She’s really putting the Pirate Lady through the ringer.

About Zosia, yes, she’s part of an alien-influenced, worldwide cabal that has upended humankind and is determined to turn Carol into one of them. And yet! I still feel so bad for Zosia here. First it’s the way Carol drills into her about whether or not there’s a way to undo or reverse the Joining (apparently there is), and then how she, you know, drugs Zosia and causes her to go into freaking cardiac arrest. The Joined, the whole mass of them – I guess the whole planet’s worth? – are so pathetic in that scene as they cry in unison, powerless under Carol’s questioning.

That said, Carol’s story about the conversion therapy horror that her mother put her through at the Freedom Falls camp is pretty harrowing, and it’s pretty chilling when she points out that the always-smiling counselors there remind her of the always-smiling Joined. But then Zosia’s logic is at the very least compelling when she points out that while all the Joined know what it’s like to not be “alone” like Carol, Carol has no idea what it’s like to be one of the Joined. Maybe it’s not so bad?

Eh, screw that. In the spirit of Charlton Heston and each ever-loving mutant zombie he fought, every talking ape whose clutches he clawed his way out of, and every Soylent Green-ridden dystopia he sought to expose, Carol is a survivor and a fighter, and just as that conversion therapy camp couldn’t beat her, I have a feeling the Joined are in for the fight of their lives too.

And she hasn’t even met Manousos Oviedo yet!

Questions and Notes From Kepler-22b

  • How was the heroin?
  • Who else was yelling at the screen “Don’t lick the underside of that tin can top where the fly was buzzing around”!?
  • Does the internet work anymore in this world? I mean, I guess the Joined are sort of their own Internet now. But what about for Carol and the rest of the non-infected?
  • Seeing that note Manousos left for his (former) clientele, I couldn’t help but wonder if he does not fully grasp what has happened with the Joined. Or is he just being really optimistic that they’re all going to snap out of it?
  • “F#@$ your mother, @$hole!”

  •  

Danny DeVito Once Gave Foundation’s Jared Harris a Warning That Changed the Course of His Career

“What makes you happier? Is knowing the truth going to make you happier, or is living with a happy illusion the way to go? Which is the right choice?”

That, according to actor Jared Harris, is the question that lies at the heart of Reawakening, the Virginia Gilbert-directed film which is making its digital debut this week. The story of a husband and wife whose teenage daughter went missing a decade ago, only to have her – seemingly – reappear in their lives one day, Reawakening is part mystery, part heartbreaking what-if? tale, and part acting tour de force for Harris, who plays John, the dad of the family, Erin Doherty (Adolescence), who co-stars as the daughter Clare, and Juliet Stevenson, who plays the mother Mary.

I jumped on a Zoom call with Harris this week to talk about Reawakening, what’s going on with his sprawling Apple TV sci-fi series Foundation, his time on Mad Men, and the career-altering advice he once received from none other than Danny DeVito…

Reawakening: Is She Who She Says She Is?

The thing about the return of Clare in Reawakening is that what should be an incredibly happy occasion is nothing but. You see, Harris’ character John doesn’t believe that this 24-year-old woman is actually the same person who disappeared 10 years earlier.

“Is she who she says she is?” says Harris. “Why do the parents have such a different reaction to her? One of them immediately welcomes her, and then the other one doesn't think that it's her. The ironic thing is the one who's not convinced is the person who never stopped looking for her. You would expect that he would be the one who would go, ‘Oh, she's home!’ And then the mother would go, ‘Hang on.’ But it's the opposite way to that.”

Indeed, in the scene where John first finds that Clare, or someone claiming to be Clare, has returned home, he has a panic attack and then literally runs from the house and down the street, banging his hands against his head. It’s a fight or flight reaction.

“He'd imagined this moment and he'd thought there'd be this incredibly powerful connection that would occur between them,” says Harris of that scene. “She'd come running into his arms, and he'd say, ‘I never stopped looking for you sweetheart.’ ‘Oh, Daddy, Daddy, Daddy.’ … And it doesn't happen. He looks at her and he doesn't feel that instant pulse of recognition.”

'I think that what he doesn't understand is, why don't I feel that it's her? What's wrong with me?'

And yet somehow his wife Mary is accepting this person, this apparent stranger, into their home with open arms.

“‘Am I nuts?’” is what John is thinking according to Harris. “He's actually been gaslit, and I think that what he doesn't understand is, why don't I feel that it's her? What's wrong with me? Because my bellwether is Mary, and Mary knows that it's her, so what's wrong with me?”

As for whether or not this Clare really is the Clare who disappeared 10 years ago, well, you’ll have to watch the movie to find that out. But again, the movie is as much about that as it is what the arrival of this person at John and Mary’s doorstep means for the rest of their lives. The film is called Reawakening, after all.

“Mary says, ‘This has made me happy. Why pull it apart?’” explains Harris. “There was this terrible emptiness in our life, and then this thing has come and it’s filled in this gaping hole. Just accept it as a gift. What does it matter?’”

Foundation and Finding the Humanity in a Sci-Fi Epic

One of the aspects of Reawakening that appealed to Harris was the smaller-scale story and more intimate production as compared to the huge undertaking that is Foundation, which is based on the classic books by Isaac Asimov and in which he stars as Hari Seldon, the inventor of “psychohistory,” a sort of math that allows Hari to predict the future. The actor was in the last week of filming Season 3 of the epic series when the script for Reawakening arrived. The original lead actor had dropped out due to pandemic delays, which meant Harris only had 10 days prep time before shooting.

“[It was] a relief,” says the actor of switching gears for Reawakening. “Because the thing you are always fighting with on something that's on the scale of Foundation… the sci-fi world with these big ideas and everything, is you are arguing with the showrunners – and arguing in the most positive and collaborative sense – for the human element, because there's an obsession with plot. Because they've got so many storylines that are spinning, and they're all trying to bring them to the same crescendo at the right time at the end of the season.”

Harris also points out that not only is Foundation meant to take place over the course of a thousand years – each season has seen a time-jump so far – but there have been four versions of Hari to date, thanks to his tendency to reincarnate as a holographic version of himself: “The original version of Hari. There's the Hari that exists in the Vault. There's the Hari that was on [the ship] the Raven. And that version of Hari gets his body back.

“My way of solving those things with [the showrunners] is to make it as humanly accessible as possible. It's very difficult with a character like Hari Seldon, who isn't real. He doesn't physically exist in the same sense that we are aware of that. What you are always doing is saying, ‘Yeah, but he couldn't do that,’ or, ‘He couldn't know that. What can he know? What can't he know? What can he do? What can't he do?’”

The danger with Hari is that he can wind up being the guy who “knows everything.” But for Harris, that’s boring.

“That's just not interesting. There's nothing to add,” he says. “You end up just being superior and then proven wrong all the time. What's the point? And then also the character's somewhat redundant because once they gave [Lou Llobell’s character] Gaal a superpower, what does it matter if you've got a mathematical structure like Cambridge Analytica that can predict the events of people? This person's got a superpower. You don't need it. It's always been a struggle to try and find the relevance of the character and the humanity of the character.”

David S. Goyer (who has written for everything from the Blade trilogy to the Dark Knight films to some Call of Duty games) was the showrunner on Foundation until stepping back prior to Season 3’s production. Not surprisingly, the circumstances of his departure and to what degree he was involved in Season 3 has remained fairly opaque, and Harris says the same was true for he and his castmates. That said, Ian Goldberg and David Kob will be co-showrunners starting with Season 4, and Harris has already had a positive experience with the new team.

“David Kob, who took over the creative side of it once Goyer left, he is a wonderful person,” says the actor. “You can have really good chats with him. He'll tell you why something isn't going to work. He says, ‘No, we can't do that,’ and he'll give you an X, Y, and Z rather than... Often what happens is no one wants to say no to anybody in Hollywood. They go, ‘Oh, yeah, that's a great idea,’ and it just never happens. You know why it didn't happen. But he's a good person, and he'll tell you why. And then you go, ‘OK, well let's think of something else. Let's think of a different solution to that problem because the problem still exists. But what if we solve it this way? What if we solve it that way?’ It's a proper dialogue and a proper collaboration.”

Harris relates a specific back and forth he had with the producers regarding an idea that was floating around involving the return of the Lethe Syndrome which Hari had been revealed to be suffering from in Season 1.

“Bill Bost, who took over as the producing showrunner, he trusted David and occasionally would jump in with things,” says Harris. “I said, ‘It's an interesting idea, but if that's what we're going to play, this five-page scene that you've written for us, it's going to take 25 minutes because I've got to keep forgetting what's going on.’ Bill Bost went, ‘Yeah, you know what? Let's just leave. Let's just push that to the side.’ That was a bit of bullshit that he told Gaal just to get her to shut up and get her to agree with him in Episode 7 of Season 1. It wasn't real.”

Danny DeVito’s Career-Changing Warning

“Good luck kid, because you're going to need it.”

That’s what Danny DeVito told Harris years ago during an audition session. He was talking about Harris’ career prospects, but not in a mean way – if anything, DeVito was admiring the actor’s chameleon-like ability to disappear into a role. But it was also meant as a warning for Harris.

“I went, ‘What are you talking about? What do you mean?’” laughs Harris. “He goes, ‘You really need me to explain this to you? You're so different in everything you do.’ I say, ‘Isn't that the idea?’ He goes, ‘A successful actor is a recognizable actor. You are trying to start from scratch every single time you appear in a role. You have to hope that one day it will catch up with you.”

Harris had been working as a professional actor since the late 1980s, but he hadn’t broken through in a major way at the time of the meeting with DeVito.

“I'd done a lot of independent movies, and largely because I grew up watching the movies of the ’70s,” he recalls. “I foolishly thought that I could have a career like that without recognizing that that world had moved on.”

'You are trying to start from scratch every single time you appear in a role. You have to hope that one day it will catch up with you.'

DeVito’s words apparently had an effect on him, however. 2008’s The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, in which Harris had a part, proved to be an important project for the actor. Mad Men showrunner Matthew Weiner saw it and that led to Harris’ landing the role of Lane Pryce in Season 3 of the AMC show, which was already a huge critical hit. Lane started off as a stuffy interloper at Sterling Cooper from the other side of the pond, until he wasn’t anymore and became one of the most tragic figures in the series’ entire run.

“[it was] not seen by a lot of people, but seen by everybody in the business,” says Harris of Mad Men. “Its cultural significance can't be overstated. It changed the way men looked, the way men dressed... They actually dressed like adults for the first time, and it revived cocktail culture in the United States. The idea of glamour for men and women.”

That led to getting the role of the villainous Professor Moriarty in the Robert Downey, Jr. sequel Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows, a memorable turn as King George VI in Season 1 of Netflix’s The Crown, and then 2019's Chernobyl, for which he won a British Academy Television Award in the lead role of Valery Legasov.

All of which leads to the question. Was DeVito right?

“Has it caught up with me?” laughs Harris. “Is that what you're saying? Has it caught up with me? I hope so. I hope so. I'm still childishly attached to the idea of being different in everything.”

  •  

Wicked: For Good Review

Wicked: For Good will be released in theaters on November 21.

Midway through Wicked: For Good, at the climax of one the musical’s many songs, Cynthia Erivo is harshly backlit by that pesky Ozian sun that has somehow made it into virtually every frame of this story. The camera pans slowly away, and, ah, a respite from all the squinting you have to do in order to see anything that’s going on in this movie! But the relief is short-lived, because the shot eventually settles on a giant waterfall that is… reflecting all of the light from that very same sun, obscuring the main character once more behind a wall of photons.

I use this small example to illustrate Wicked: For Good’s central problem: it has all of the issues of the first movie, compounded by the fact that Act II of Wicked the musical is, famously, just not as good as the first.

The story has jumped in time an unspecified number of years, and the tricky Wizard (Jeff Goldblum) and his mouthpiece Glinda the Good (Ariana Grande) have convinced the people of Oz that the green-skinned “wicked witch” Elphaba (Erivo) is Public Enemy Number One. Meanwhile, Elphaba, who’s been exiled to the woods, is dead-set on drawing back the curtain on the Wizard’s fakery and saving the lives of all the sentient Animals who are progressively forgetting how to speak. It’s a Very Serious setup for a Very Serious movie, with none of the effervescent pizzazz of the first act/film. That’s the trouble with the dreary back end of this story—you’ve already had all the fun of getting to meet everyone for the first time, and now all that’s left is to watch them make themselves miserable.

It’s a weird tonal shift that just doesn’t match the inherent absurdity of the environment. Wicked plays things very sincerely with its very silly story (I say this as a fan), but there are always moments in the show—a hilariously mispronounced word here, a well-timed aside there—that wink at the ridiculousness of the premise. In contrast, watching Wicked: For Good is like watching a war movie, complete with action sequences, wrenching interpersonal drama, and a harrowing refugee escape scene that provides the backdrop for one of the film’s two original songs, the somber don’t-let-the-bastards-get-you-down anthem “No Place Like Home.” The self-serious atmosphere makes talking animals and the occasional mention of the community of people that calls themselves “Munchkins” even more jarring. Look, they already tried to do “grimdark Wizard of Oz” with the childhood trauma-inducing Return to Oz and Syfy’s Tin Man miniseries, and (again, I say this as a fan) it didn’t really work those times, either.

You’ve already had all the fun of getting to meet everyone in Wicked: Part I, and now all that’s left is to watch them make themselves miserable.

And then there’s the fact that you can’t see most of it anyway. Director Jon M. Chu and cinematographer Alice Brooks’ commitment to backlighting every scene with a sun, a lantern, or a wall of torches persists here—probably because Wicked and Wicked: For Good were shot at the same time—and was already roundly criticized by critics and fans the first time around. The second film is darker in every sense of the word (aside from many of Grande’s scenes, thank goodness), and there are environments that are so dimly lit you can’t make out Erivo’s face at all.

It’s all very frustrating, because, as with the first film, you can tell that real work was put into building opulent environments for the actors to stomp around in. Chu outdoes his own wedding staging from Crazy Rich Asians here, throwing Glinda a party overflowing with flowers and fit for a fairy queen. The tower Elphaba eventually transforms into her lair during the triumphant villain song “No Good Deed” looks like a battleground from Elden Ring. Cool, tactile sets shrouded in shadows are maybe marginally better than the washed-out lighting of the too-bright first movie, but, given how inertly everyone is often staged in this film, you still get the sense that you’re watching people walking around in sets.

The songs though are almost enough to make you forget about all of this. Erivo and Grande are so good it makes the fact that these movies aren’t that great even more disappointing, and they especially nail all the complicated, contradictory emotions and themes running through this sequel. Wicked: For Good does its best to yank them back and forth—allies one moment, enemies the next, and then back to besties again—but they both keep themselves steady, electrifying things whenever they’re sharing the screen. Jonathan Bailey’s Fiyero, the third member of their isosceles love triangle, holds his own with the two of them, even though he doesn’t get much to do here besides roll his broad shoulders and smolder directly at the camera, and that’s fine. (Michelle Yeoh’s propaganda minister Madame Morrible remains the weak link, which is a shame, as she’s the only truly villainous character in this whole thing and clearly relishes any opportunity to be mean.)

Really, the biggest problem with Wicked: For Good is its atonal pacing—songs take ages to finish, while characters are constantly being tossed into scene after scene with very few transitions in between to fully explain why anyone is acting the way that they are. And it’s doing all this while also stepping on most of the source material’s best bits—Elphaba’s big Wicked Witch laugh moment, which ignites cheers in the theater, is barely gestured at. Wicked 2 is certainly long enough to lay everything out in a sensible manner (at 137 minutes, it’s only 20 minutes shorter than the first movie), but seems to think that audiences will just go ahead and fill in the blanks for themselves. Its songs and talent are certainly good enough to coast on, but it still fails to make the case for translating a beloved stage show to two just-okay films. It’s time for this bubble to pop.

  •